RISK STRATIFICATION, REGISTERS AND PROGNOSTIC SCALES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2017-3-159-165
Abstract
About the Author
Marzhanat G. AlievaRussian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Dagestan State Medical University, lead of the infarction department of the Republican Clinical Hospital of the Center for Specialized Emergency Medical Care. Russia, 367000, Makhachkala, st. Pirogov, 3. Теl.: 89634139848.
References
1. Carmo P., Ferreira J., Aguiar C., Ferreira A., Raposo L., Gonçalves P., Brito J., Silva A. Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores? Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011. Vol.16. no.3. pp. 239–249.
2. Khalill R., Lei H., Chang J. The TIMI, GRACE or PURSUIT risk models. The use of risk scores for stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients. Br. J. Cardiol. 2009. Vol. 16. iss. 6. pp. 265–267.
3. Carruthers K.F., Dabbous O.H., Flather M.D., Starkey I., Jacob A., MacLeod D., Fox K.A.A. Contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes: Does the practice match the evidence? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Heart. 2005. Vol. 91. iss. 3. pp. 290–298. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.031237
4. Kharchenko M.S., Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. Assessment of the Prognostic Value of the CRUSADE Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Hospitalized in a “Noninvasive” Hospital. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2012. Vol. 52. no. 8. pp. 27–32. (In Russian)
5. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. Acute non STelevation Coronary Syndrome in real practice of hospitals in Russia. Comparative data from RECORD-2 and RECORD regisries. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2012. Vol. 52. no. 10. pp. 9–16. (In Russian) 6. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes RECORD. characteristics of patients and results of in hospital treatment. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2009. Vol. 49. no. 7-8. pp. 4–12. (In Russian)
6. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. The RECORD Registry. Treatment of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in hospitals with and without possibilities to perform invasive coronary procedures. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2010. Vol. 50. no. 7. pp. 15–20. (In Russian)
7. Erlikh A.D. A Scale for early assessment of risk of death and death or myocardial infarction during initial hospitalization of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (based on data from the RECORD registry). Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2010. Vol. 50. no. 10. pp. 11–16. (In Russian)
8. Méndez-Eirín E., Flores-Ríos X., García-López F., Pérez-Pérez A.J., Estévez-Loureiro R., Piñón-Esteban P., Aldama-López G., Salgado-Fernández J., CalviñoSantos R.A., Vázquez Rodríguez J.M., VázquezGonzález N., Castro-Beiras A. Comparison of the prognostic predictive value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE risk scores in STEACS undergoing primary or rescue PCI. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. (Engl Ed). 2014. Vol. 65. Iss. 3. pp.227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.10.019
Review
For citations:
Alieva M.G. RISK STRATIFICATION, REGISTERS AND PROGNOSTIC SCALES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2017;12(3):159-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2017-3-159-165