Preview

South of Russia: ecology, development

Advanced search

RISK STRATIFICATION, REGISTERS AND PROGNOSTIC SCALES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2017-3-159-165

Abstract

Abstract. Aim. The aim of the research is to consider the possibilities most often used in practical cardiology of registers and prognostic scales in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Discussion. The heterogeneity of the clinical picture, the results of ECG studies, levels of cardiomarkers and pathophysiological mechanisms of ACS cause different levels of risk of cardiac complications and death of patients in the short and long term. In such patients, stratification of risk, especially of early cardiac complications, is a key factor in determining treatment strategies and quality of life. The main method that allows solving these problems is cohort observational programs or registers of different levels and purposes. The GRACE scale is perhaps the most powerful in its predictive value. Unlike other scales, GRACE includes an evaluation of renal function and with the sufficient frequency of renal arterial hypertension associated with ACS and renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 75 mL / min) the GRACE predictive accuracy improves significantly. Conclusion. Analysis of the literature shows that at present leading centers of cardiology, a lot of attention is given to the development of ACS registers and prognostic scales with maximum power and specificity as well as sufficient ease of use and the possibility of further improvement. The reliability and informativeness of registers and prognostic scales is based on the use of the principles of evidence-based medicine and advanced methods of medical statistics.

About the Author

Marzhanat G. Alieva
Dagestan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Dagestan State Medical University, lead of the infarction department of the Republican Clinical Hospital of the Center for Specialized Emergency Medical Care. Russia, 367000, Makhachkala, st. Pirogov, 3. Теl.: 89634139848.


References

1. Carmo P., Ferreira J., Aguiar C., Ferreira A., Raposo L., Gonçalves P., Brito J., Silva A. Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores? Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2011. Vol.16. no.3. pp. 239–249.

2. Khalill R., Lei H., Chang J. The TIMI, GRACE or PURSUIT risk models. The use of risk scores for stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients. Br. J. Cardiol. 2009. Vol. 16. iss. 6. pp. 265–267.

3. Carruthers K.F., Dabbous O.H., Flather M.D., Starkey I., Jacob A., MacLeod D., Fox K.A.A. Contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes: Does the practice match the evidence? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Heart. 2005. Vol. 91. iss. 3. pp. 290–298. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.031237

4. Kharchenko M.S., Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. Assessment of the Prognostic Value of the CRUSADE Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Hospitalized in a “Noninvasive” Hospital. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2012. Vol. 52. no. 8. pp. 27–32. (In Russian)

5. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. Acute non STelevation Coronary Syndrome in real practice of hospitals in Russia. Comparative data from RECORD-2 and RECORD regisries. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2012. Vol. 52. no. 10. pp. 9–16. (In Russian) 6. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes RECORD. characteristics of patients and results of in hospital treatment. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2009. Vol. 49. no. 7-8. pp. 4–12. (In Russian)

6. Erlikh A.D., Gratsiansky N.A. The RECORD Registry. Treatment of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in hospitals with and without possibilities to perform invasive coronary procedures. Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2010. Vol. 50. no. 7. pp. 15–20. (In Russian)

7. Erlikh A.D. A Scale for early assessment of risk of death and death or myocardial infarction during initial hospitalization of patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (based on data from the RECORD registry). Kardiologiya [Kardiologiia]. 2010. Vol. 50. no. 10. pp. 11–16. (In Russian)

8. Méndez-Eirín E., Flores-Ríos X., García-López F., Pérez-Pérez A.J., Estévez-Loureiro R., Piñón-Esteban P., Aldama-López G., Salgado-Fernández J., CalviñoSantos R.A., Vázquez Rodríguez J.M., VázquezGonzález N., Castro-Beiras A. Comparison of the prognostic predictive value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE risk scores in STEACS undergoing primary or rescue PCI. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. (Engl Ed). 2014. Vol. 65. Iss. 3. pp.227–233. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.10.019


Review

For citations:


Alieva M.G. RISK STRATIFICATION, REGISTERS AND PROGNOSTIC SCALES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2017;12(3):159-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2017-3-159-165

Views: 496


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1992-1098 (Print)
ISSN 2413-0958 (Online)