COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTIC OF TOURIST POTENTIAL OF MUSEUMS OF KRASNODAR REGION
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2017-3-87-97
Abstract
Aim. The article describes the tourist potential of two large museums of the Krasnodar Territory, the Krasnodar State Historical and Archaeological Museum-Reserve named after E.D. Felitsyn and Krasnodar Regional Art Museum named after F.A. Kovalenko. Much attention is paid to the classification of museums in the Krasnodar Territory. Methods. In the study were used a comparative-geographical method, a systematic approach, an analysis of statistical-mathematical materials and an analysis of the leisure profile of citizens. Findings. A comparative assessment of the potential of two large museums of the region is given. We also conducted an analysis of the survey data of the leisure profile among the townspeople in the city of Krasnodar in order to identify which of the museums is more popular. The main indicators such as the number of storage units, the total exposition and exhibition area, the number of sightseeing visits and mass events, the number of educational programs and exhibitions, the number of employees were examined and analyzed. Distinctions between museums are also noted. Conclusions. An analysis of these data showed that both museums have sufficient tourist potential to represent the city and get acquainted with the city through museums. The results of an analysis of events held in museums to attract visitors are presented. The sufficient tourist potential of two large museums for representation of the city and region is defined. The directions for their development as objects of tourism are proposed.
About the Authors
Svetlana V. Kirilicheva
Kuban State University
Russian Federation
graduate student, Kuban State University, Russia, 350002 Krasnodar, 12-34 Sadovaya st., tel.: 8-952-829-09-73,
Russian Federation
graduate student, Kuban State University, Russia, 350002 Krasnodar, 12-34 Sadovaya st., tel.: 8-952-829-09-73,
Anatoly A. Filobok
Kuban State University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Sub-department of Economic, Social and Political Geography, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Sub-department of Economic, Social and Political Geography, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia
Vera V. Minenkova
Kuban State University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Sub-department of Economic, Social and Political Geography, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Sub-department of Economic, Social and Political Geography, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russia.
References
1. Romanchuk A.V. Muzeinyi turizm: uchebnometodicheskoe posobie [Museum tourism: educationalmethodical manual]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publ., 2010. pp. 4–46.
2. Kirilicheva S.V., Filobok A.A. Est' li budushchee u muzeinogo turizma? [Is there a future for museum tourism?]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii «Kurortno-turistskii kompleks v sisteme regional'nogo razvitiya: innovatsionnye podkhody», Krasnodar, 2014 [Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Resort-Tourist Complex in the System of Regional Development: Innovative Approaches", Krasnodar, 2014]. Krasnodar, 2014. pp. 305–308.
3. Muzei i ego osnovatel' [Museum and its founder]. Official site (KGIAMZ). Available at: http://felicina.ru/-muzee.html. (accessed 17.02.2017)
4. Kirilicheva S.V., Filobok A.A. Perspektivy ispol'zovaniya muzeev v sfere sotsial'no-kul'turnogo turizma (na primere «Krasnodarskogo khudozhestvennogo muzeya imeni F.A. Kovalenko») [Prospects for the use of museums in the field of social and cultural tourism (on the example of the Krasnodar Kovalenko Art Museum)]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii «Kurortno-turistskii kompleks v sisteme regional'nogo razvitiya: innovatsionnye podkhody», Krasnodar, 2013 [Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Resort-Tourist Complex in the System of Regional Development: Innovative Approaches", Krasnodar, 2013]. Krasnodar, 2013. pp. 158–163.
5. Kirilicheva S.V. Museum tourism as a new form of activity of the art museum. In: Sbornik soobshchenii k mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Kovalenkovskie chteniya 100+10: Yubileinyi vypusk 8 [Collection of reports to the international scientific and practical conference. Kovalenko Readings 100 + 10: Anniversary Issue 8]. Krasnodar, Krasnodar Art Museum named after F.A. Kovalenko Publ., 2014. pp. 165–166.
6. Kirilicheva S.V., Filobok A.A. Muzeinyi turizm, kak odno iz prioritetnykh napravlenii diversifikatsii turistskogo produkta v Krasnodarskom krae [Museum tourism as one of the priority directions of diversification of the tourist product in the Krasnodar Territory]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Kurortno-turistskii kompleks v sisteme regional'nogo razvitiya: innovatsionnye podkhody», Krasnodar, 2015 [Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Resort-Tourist Complex in the System of Regional Development: Innovative Approaches", Krasnodar, 2015]. Krasnodar, 2015. pp. 396–399.
7. Muzei v sisteme turizma [Museum in the tourism system]. Website Portfolio of the pupil. Available at: http://lib.rushkolnik.ru/text/624/index-2-3.html. (accessed 17.01.2017)
8. Galachieva L.A. Muzeinyi turizm i perspektivy ego razvitiya v Kabardino-Balkarii [Museum tourism and prospects of its development in Kabardino-Balkaria]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Geografiya i region», Perm', 23–25 sentyabrya, 2015 [Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference "Geography and the Region", Perm, 23-25 September, 2015]. Perm, 2015. pp. 44-50.
Review
For citations:
Kirilicheva S.V., Filobok A.A., Minenkova V.V. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTIC OF TOURIST POTENTIAL OF MUSEUMS OF KRASNODAR REGION. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2017;12(3):87-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2017-3-87-97
Views:
573
Email this article 
