Исследование влияния коронавируса на активный транспорт как возможности для устойчивого развития туристического направления в эпоху после COVID‐19 с акцентом на местное сообщество (на примере города Доруд провинции Лорестан, Иран)

Целью данного исследования является структурное моделирование влияния коронавируса на активный транспорт в посткоронавирусный период в городе Доруд в Иране, с акцентом как на туризм, так и на развитие долгосрочного туристического рынка путем продвижения низкоуглеродных туристических рынков.
Исследование проводилось с использованием аналитико‐описательного метода. Инструментом исследования была анкета, составленная исследователем и случайным образом распределенная среди жителей города Доруд. Было исследовано влияние различных факторов, включая экономические, социальные, медицинские и доступность, на активный транспорт во время этой эпидемии и его влияние на транспорт в эпоху после COVID‐19. Кроме того, был разработан проект развития устойчивого туризма с акцентом на местное сообщество.
Социальный фактор имеет наибольшую факторную нагрузку с весовым показателем 0,94. Напротив, при наименьшей факторной нагрузке, т.е. 0,60, экономический фактор оказал наименьшее влияние на выбор активного вида транспорта. Было установлено, что переменная использования активного транспорта в эпоху после коронавируса с факторной нагрузкой 0,66 является наиболее влиятельным фактором, в то время как социальные последствия коронавируса с факторной нагрузкой 0,49 оказались наиболее значимыми. Наименее эффективная переменная приходится на период после коронавируса.
Активное транспортное сообщение во время эпидемии коронавируса в городе Доруд с коэффициентом регрессии 0,77 оказало статистически значимое влияние на использование этого вида транспорта в период после коронавируса. Это может быть включено в план развития транспорта с акцентом на активный трансфер как эффективный вариант развития устойчивого туризма.

1. Huang J., Wang H., Fan M., Zhuo A., Sun Y., Li Y. Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on transportation-related behaviors with human mobility data // Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2020. P. 3443–3450. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.12264

2. Tirachini A., Cats O. COVID-19 and public transportation: Current assessment, prospects, and research needs // Journal of Public Transportation. 2020. V. 22. N 1. P. 1–21. DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1

3. Fische J., Winters M. COVID-19 street reallocation in mid-sized Canadian cities: socio-spatial equity patterns // Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2021. V. 112. N 3. P. 376–390. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00467-3

4. Kim E.J., Kim J., Kim H. Neighborhood walkability and active transportation: a correlation study in leisure and shopping purposes // International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020. V. 17. N 7. P. 2178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072178

5. Jamal S., Mohiuddin H., Paez A. How do the perceptions of neighborhood conditions impact active transportation? A study in Rajshahi, Bangladesh // Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102525. Journal of Environmental Studies. 2020. N 87. Article id:102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102525

6. Passi-Solar Á., Margozzini P., Cortinez-O’Ryan A., Muñoz J.C., Mindell J.S. Nutritional and metabolic benefits associated with active and public transport: Results from the Chilean National Health Survey, ENS 2016–2017 // Journal of Transport & Health. 2020. N 17. Article ID: 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100819

7. González S.A., Aubert S., Barnes J.D., Larouche R., Tremblay M.S. Profiles of active transportation among children and adolescents in the global matrix 3.0 initiative: A 49-country comparison // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020. V. 17. N 16. Article ID: 5997. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165997

8. Mogaji E. Impact of COVID-19 on transportation in Lagos, Nigeria // Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2020. N 6. Article id: 100154. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100154

9. Aguilar-Farias N., Cortinez-O’Ryan A., Chandia-Poblete D., Heesch K.C. Prevalence and correlates of transport cycling in Chile: results from 2014 to 2015 national surveys // Journal of Transport & Health. 2019. N 14. Article ID: 100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100594

10. Bitaab N., Heidari F., Khadivi G.N. Investigating Strategies for Creating Healthy Cities with Sustainable Development Approach // European Journal of Research. 2018. N 1. P. 34–44. DOI: 10.26739/2521-3253-2018-1-4-4

11. Darmajanti L., Tampi D.M., Fitrinitia I.S. Sustainable Urban Development: Building Healthy Cities in Indonesia // 55th ISOCARP World Planning Congress. 2021. DOI:10.47472/MBXO5435

12. Giles-Corti B., Lowe M., Arundel J. Achieving the SDGs: Evaluating indicators to be used to benchmark and monitor progress towards creating healthy and sustainable cities // Health Policy. 2020. V. 124. N 6. P. 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.001

13. Yan D., Wu S., Zhou S., Li F., Wang Y. Healthy city development for Chinese cities under dramatic imbalance: evidence from 258 cities // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021. N 74. Article ID: 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103157

14. Louro A., Marques da Costa N., Marques da Costa E. Sustainable urban mobility policies as a path to healthy cities – The case study of LMA, Portugal // Sustainability. 2019. V. 11. N 10. Article ID: 2929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102929

15. Ilbeigi M. Statistical process control for analyzing resilience of transportation networks // International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2019. N 33. P. 155–161. DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.002

16. Vajjarapu H., Verma A., Gulzar S. Adaptation Policy Framework for Climate Change Impacts on Transportation Sector in Developing Countries // Transportation in Developing Economies. 2019. V. 5. N 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-019-0071-y

17. Tran N.H., Yang S.H., Huang T. Comparative analysis of traffic-and-transportation-planning-related indicators in sustainable transportation infrastructure rating systems // International journal of sustainable transportation. 2021. V. 15. N 3. P. 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1722868

18. Morrison D., Shaffer A., Lewis R., Lewman H. Framing Livability: A Strategic and Creative Communication Approach to Improving Support for Public Transportation in Oregon // PDXScholar. 2018. DOI: 10.15760/trec.208

19. Gecchelin T., Webb J. Modular dynamic ride-sharing transport systems // Economic Analysis and Policy. 2019. V. 61. P. 111–117. DOI: 10.15760/trec.208

20. Shi Y., Arthanari T., Liu X., Yang B. Sustainable transportation management: Integrated modeling and support // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. V. 212. P. 1381–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.209

21. Zhan D., Kwan M.P., Zhang W., Fan J., Yu J., Dang Y. Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China // Cities. 2018. V. 79. P. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025

22. Aghaabbasi M., Shah M.Z., Zainol R. Investigating the Use of Active Transportation Modes among University Employees through an Advanced Decision Tree Algorithm // Civil and Sustainable Urban Engineering. 2021. V. 1. N 1. P. 26–49. https://doi.org/10.53623/csue.v1i1.28

23. Sharifi A., Khavarian-Garmsir A.R. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management // Science of the Total Environment. 2020. V. 749. Article ID: 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391

24. Connolly C., Livy M.R., Qiu Y., Klaiber H.A. Capitalization of interconnected active transportation infrastructure // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2019. V. 182. P. 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.09.010

25. Young D.R., Cradock A.L., Eyler A.A., Fenton M., Pedroso M., Sallis J.F. American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee. Creating built environments that expand active transportation and active living across the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association // Circulation. 2020. V. 142. N 11. P. e167–e183. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000878

26. Barban P., de Nazelle A., Chatelin S., Quirion P., Jean K. Quantifying the health benefits of physical activity due to active commuting in a French transition scenario: a health impact assessment of the negaWatt scenario // MedRxiv. 2022. DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.17.22271146

27. World Health Organization. Implementation framework for Phase VII (2019–2024) of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network: goals, requirements and strategic approaches: final (No. WHO/EURO: 2019-3478-43237-60598). World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. 2019.

28. Lee A., Nakamura K. Engaging diverse community groups to promote population health through healthy city approach: Analysis of successful cases in western pacific region // International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. V. 18. N 12. Article ID: 6617. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126617

29. Ashton J., Thurston M.N. International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 2nd ed.; New Public Health: Oxford: Academic Press, 2017. V. 5. P. 231–239.

30. Luo J., Chan E.H., Du J., Feng L., Jiang P., Xu Y. Developing a Health-Spatial Indicator System for a Healthy City in Small and Midsized Cities // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022. V. 19. N 6. Article ID: 3294. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063294

31. World Health Organization. Phase V (2009–2013) of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network: goals and requirements (No. WHO/EURO: 2009-4250-44009-62064). World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.2009.

32. Kleinert S., Horton R. Urban design: an important future force for health and wellbeing // The Lancet. 2016. V. 388. N 10062. P. 2848–2850. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31578-1

33. Triguero-Mas M., Anguelovski I., Cole H.V. Healthy cities after COVID-19 pandemic: the just ecofeminist healthy cities approach // Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2022. V. 76. N 4. P. 354–359. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2021-216725

34. Ashton J. R. Healthy Cities: Concepts and Visions. University of Liverpool: Department of Community Health, 1988.

35. Bacevic J. Unthinking knowledge production: from post-Covid to post-carbon futures // Globalizations. 2021. V. 18. N 7. P. 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807855

36. Pilechiha P. Optimization Methods and Algorithms in Architectural and Urban Design, Basic Mathematical Solutions // Naqshejahan-Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2020. V. 10. N 3. P. 205–217.

37. Pilechiha P., Mahdavinejad M., Rahimian F.P., Carnemolla P., Seyedzadeh S. Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency // Applied Energy. 2020. V. 261. Article ID: 114356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356

38. DeLeeuw E. Evidence for Healthy Cities: reflections on practice, method and theory // Health Promotion International. 2009. N 24(suppl_1). P. i19–i36. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dap052

39. Glazener A., Khreis H. Transforming our cities: best practices towards clean air and active transportation // Current Environmental Health Reports. 2019. V. 6. N 1. P. 22–37. DOI:10.1007/s40572-019-0228-1

40. Teuber M., Sudeck G. Why do students walk or cycle for transportation? Perceived study environment and psychological determinants as predictors of active transportation by university students // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. V. 18. N 4. Article ID: 1390. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041390

41. Jamal S., Mohiuddin H. Active transportation indicators and establishing baseline in a developing country context: A study of Rajshahi, Bangladesh // Growth and Change. 2020. V. 51. N 4. P. 1894–1920. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12420

42. Sá T.H.D., Rezende L.F.M.D., Borges M.C., Nakamura P.M., Anapolsky S., Parra D., Monteiro C.A. Prevalence of active transportation among adults in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review of population-based studies // Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica. 2017. N 41. Article ID: e35. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.35

43. Griffin G.P., Jiao J. The geography and equity of crowdsourced public participation for active transportation planning // Transportation Research Record. 2019. V. 2673. N 1. P. 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118823498.

44. Stockton E. Active transportation policy decisions in response to COVID-19: Case studies from four North American cities. Carolina Digital Repository. 2021. https://doi.org/10.17615/fc6j-ks40

45. Buehle R., Pucher J. COVID-19 Impacts on Cycling, 2019–2020 // Transport Reviews. 2021. V. 41. N 12. P. 1–8.

46. Nian G., Peng B., Sun D.J., Ma W., Peng B., Huang T. Impact of COVID-19 on Urban Mobility during Post-Epidemic Period in Megacities: From the Perspectives of Taxi Travel and Social Vitality // Sustainability. 2020. V. 12. N 19. Article ID: 7954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197954

47. Buehler R., Pucher J. Cycling for sustainable cities. MA: MIT Press, 2021. 488 p.

48. Furth P. Bicycling infrastructure for all. Chapter 5. In: Buehler R., Pucher J., eds. Cycling for sustainable cities. Massachusetts, MIT Press Publ., 2021. P. 81–102.