Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, Russia
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-170-178
Abstract
Aim. Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on crops of soybean variety Arleta in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory.
Materials and Methods. The experiments were carried out on the experimental field of the Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection in 2022 according to the methodological recommendations for testing herbicides in agriculture. Herbicides from different chemical classes were used in the experiment. Efficiency was assessed by the difference in weed and soybean grain yield in comparison with the control. The comparative ecotoxicological load of preparations was carried out according to the ecological load and the coefficient of selectivity of action for the soil.
Results. Weed species in the experiment were highly effectively suppressed by the herbicides Pulsar, BP, Pivot, VK and a mixture of Bazagran, BP + Zellek Super, and KE (88–98 %). When using Dual Gold, EC, Frontier Optima, EC and Proponit, and EC before the soybean shoots, the biological efficacy was lower. The preparations Pulsar, BP and Pivot, and VK, in comparison with other herbicides, had a lower level of environmental load and a high coefficient of selective action and meet modern safety requirements for the natural environment.
Conclusions. In order to protect the environment when choosing herbicides for application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, they should be comprehensively selected taking into account the ecotoxicological load of the preparations.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. P. SavvaRussian Federation
Anatoly P. Savva, PhD in Biology, Leading Researcher & Head, Laboratory of Herbology
p/o 39, Krasnodar, 350039
Tel. +79184436636
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
T. N. Telezhenko
Russian Federation
Tamara N. Telezhenko
p/o 39, Krasnodar, 350039
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
V. A. Suvorova
Russian Federation
Valeria A. Suvorova
p/o 39, Krasnodar, 350039
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Mayerová M., Madaras M., Soukup J. [Effect of chemical weed control on crop yields in different crop rotations in a long-term field trial]. Crop Protection, 2018, vol. 114, pp. 215–222. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219418302059 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
2. Butkevičienė L.M. et al. [The influence of long-term different crop rotations and monoculture on weed prevalence and weed seed content in the soil]. Agronomy, 2021, no. 7. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/7/1367 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
3. Tataridas A., Kanatas P.,Chatzigeorgiou A., et al. [Sustainable crop and weed management in the era of the EU Green Deal: A survival guide]. Agronomy, 2022, no. 3, pp. 589. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/3/589 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
4. Colbach N., Gardarin A., Moreau D. The response of weed and crop species to shading: Which parameters explain weed impacts on crop production? Field Crops Research, 2019, vol. 238, pp. 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.008
5. Sharma A., Jha P., Reddy G.V.P. [Multidimensional relationships of herbicides with insect-crop food webs]. Science of the total environment, 2018, vol. 643. pp. 1522–1532. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S004896971832388X (accessed 01.03. 2023)
6. Gharde Y. et al. [Assessment of yield and economic losses in agriculture due to weeds in India]. Crop Protection, 2018, vol. 107, pp. 12–18. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219418300073 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
7. Monteiro A., Santos S. [Sustainable Approach to Weed Management: The Role of Precision Weed Management]. Agronomy, 2022, no. 1. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/1/118 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
8. Scursoni J.A., Vera A.C.D., Oreja F.H., et al. [Weed management practices in Argentina crops]. Weed Technology, 2019, vol. 33, no. 3. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/weedtechnology/article/abs/weed-management-practices-inargentina-crops/EAC2D56666889FF9E8DC84A7C4B099D0 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
9. Kocira A., Staniak M. [Weed ecology and new approaches for management]. Agriculture, 2021, vol. 11, no.3, pp. 262. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/11/3/262/htm (accessed 01.03. 2023)
10. Spiridonov Yu.Ya., Zhemchuzhin S.G., Kleimenova I.Yu. The current state of the problem of studying the herbicides application. Agrochemistry, 2019, no. 6, pp. 81–91. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.1134/S0002188119060103
11. Meriem H., Rafika L. [Effectiveness of herbicides on the weed flora of winter cereals in the region of sétifian high plains, algeria]. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 2021, no. 2, pp. 63–72. Available at: https://www.ikppress.org/index.php/PCBMB/article/view/6001 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
12. Dayan F.E. [Current status and future prospects in herbicide discovery]. Plants, 2019, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 341. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/8/9/341 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
13. Meena R.S., Kumar S., Datta R., et al. [Impact of agrochemicals on soil microbiota and management: A review]. Land, 2020, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 34. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/2/34 (accessed 01.03. 2023)
14. Savva A.P., Telezhenko T.N., Suvorova V.A., Kovalev S.S. Antifungal herbicide Flex, BP for the protection of soybean crops in the Krasnodar Territory. Achievements of science and technology of agriculture, 2022, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 69–73. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.53859/02352451_2022_36_3_69
15. Savva A.P., Telezhenko T.N., Suvorova V.A. Novyi otechestvennyi preparat Neksus na posevakh soi v usloviyakh tsentral'noi zony Krasnodarskogo kraya [A new domestic drug Nexus on soybean crops in the conditions of the central zone of the Krasnodar Territory]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii «Biologicheskaya zashchita rastenii – osnova stabilizatsii agroekosistem», Krasnodar, 13–15 sentyabrya [Materials of the international scientific and practical conference "Biological protection of plants – the basis of stabilization of agroecosystems", Krasnodar, 13–15 September 2022]. Krasnodar, 2022, pp. 321–332. (In Russian)
16. Savva A.P., Telezhenko T.N., Suvorova V.A. Otechestvennyi preparat Kogorta na posevakh soi v Krasnodarskom krae [Domestic drug Cohort on soybean crops in the Krasnodar Territory]. Materialy Zhuchenkovskikh chtenii VII «Biologicheskie osnovy zashchity rastenii», Krasnodar, 15 sentyabrya [Materials of the Zhuchenkov readings of the Research Institute "Biological foundations of plant protection", Krasnodar, 15 September 2022]. Krasnodar, 2022, pp. 211–219. (In Russian)
17. Golubev A.S., Makhankova T.A. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po provedeniyu registratsionnykh ispytanii gerbitsidov. FGBNU VIZR [Guidelines for conducting registration tests of herbicides]. St. Petersburg, FSBSI VIZR Publ., 2020, 80 p. (In Russian)
18. Sokolov M.S., Monastyrsky O.A., Pikushova E.A. Ekologizatsiya zashchity rastenii [Ecologization of plant protection]. Pushchino, Biopress Publ., 1994, 462 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Savva A.P., Telezhenko T.N., Suvorova V.A. Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, Russia. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2023;18(3):170‐178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-170-178