Application of logical and mathematical methods for the analysis of environmental information
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2022-4-206-211
Abstract
Aim. Evaluation of the possibilities of mathematical logic and logical‐mathematical methods in the description of complex natural systems in simple and clear constructions, as they act as a language, special research methods, a source of ideas and concepts in natural science.
Discussion. The article discusses the possibilities and advantages of logical and mathematical methods in the analysis of natural science information, and, in particular, environmental data. It gives a comparative overview of logical and mathematical constructions in the formation of scientific thinking. The list of the most common mathematical and logical symbols for the formalised recording of complex ecological systems is provided, together with examples of the use of logical and mathematical formulas as formal and implicative statements in the brief recording of natural science information.
Conclusion. The research conducted does not convincingly indicate unambiguous advantages of using the symbols of mathematical logic rather than verbal presentation. However, since ecology deals with the description of arch‐complex systems, including operations of formalised problem statement, the formalised structuring of ecosystems, the grouping of ecosystems according to measures of their similarity‐difference or inclusion–intersection, and the classification of selected ecosystems in a certain specified group, the need for widespread application of logical and mathematical research is indisputable.
About the Authors
L. Sh. AkhmedovaRussian Federation
Leila Sh. Akhmedova, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Recreational Geography and Sustainable Development
21 Dakhadaeva St, Makhachkala 367000
Tel. +79154706260
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
A. A. Magomedova
Russian Federation
Asiyat A. Magomedova
Makhachkala
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
R. T. Radjabova
Russian Federation
Raisat T. Radjabova
Makhachkala
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
1. Bazhenov L.B. Sovremennay nauchnay gipoteza [Modern scientific hypothesis]. In: Materialistic Dialectics and methods of Natural science. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1968, pp. 294–321.
2. Hasanov Sh.Sh. Sintez kriolitologicheskogo znaniy [Synthesis of cryolithological knowledge]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, 89 p.
3. Poya D. Matematika I pravdopodobnie rassuzhdeniy [Mathematics and plausible reasoning]. 2nd ed., Moscow, 1975.
4. Shafarevich I.R., Borevich Z.I. Teoriy chisel [Number theory]. 3rd ed., Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985.
5. Komissarov M.L., Komkova N.P. The role of mathematics in our life. Uniy ucheniy [Young Scientist]. 2020. N 2 (32). pp. 35–38.
6. Sergeev Yu.N. Modeling of ecological systems. Osnovi geoekologii [Fundamentals of geoecology]. St. Petersburg State University Publ., 1994, pp. 297–349.
7. Akhmedova L.Sh., Hasanov Sh.Sh. Biologicheskoe raznoobrazie I ustoychivost ekosistem: izmerenie, osenka, interpretasiy [Biological diversity and ecosystem sustainability: measurement, assessment, interpretation]. Makhachkala: publishing and printing site of IPE RD "Eco-press", 2015, 352 p.
8. Dmitriev V.V. Applied ecology in the system of higher geographical and environmental education. Voprosi prikladnoy ekologii [Questions of applied ecology]. Collection of scientific works of RGGMU, St. Petersburg, RGGMU, 2002, pp. 90–96.
9. Dmitriev V.V. Metodicheskie ukazaniy po discipline “Sistemnay ekologiy” dly visshih uchebnih zavedeniy [Methodological guidelines on the discipline "System ecology" for higher educational institutions]. St. Petersburg: RGGMU, 2010. 39 p.
10. Fedorov V.D., Gelmanov T.G. Ekologiy [Ecology]. MSU Publ., 1980, 464 p.
Review
For citations:
Akhmedova L.Sh., Magomedova A.A., Radjabova R.T. Application of logical and mathematical methods for the analysis of environmental information. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2022;17(4):206‐211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2022-4-206-211