Analysis of the geographical factors of sustainable development of municipalities in the south of the Urals and western Siberia
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-4-113-126
Abstract
Aim. The aim of the study is to group municipalities by the volume (or scale) of municipal economies.
Materials and Methods. On the basis of indicators of the volume of agricultural, industrial products, retail trade, investments, the cluster differentiation of municipal districts was carried out. According to the prevalence and combination of indicators, the sector is divided into 8 cluster groups: highly developed industrial, highly developed commercial, industrial and agricultural, commercial and agricultural, trade and logistics, agroindustrial, agricultural, depressed underdeveloped and single large oil producing.
Results. According to the results of clustering, certain peculiarities were revealed: more highly developed districts gravitating towards administrative urban centers and major transport arteries. In the west and east of the mesoregion, two axes of advanced development have formed: the South Ural and Altai‐Siberian.
Conclusion. In considering the forest‐steppe and steppes of the Urals and Siberia, they were compared with other natural zones that are part of the subjects of the federation studied. Depressed areas are concentrated in the centre of the mesoregion: in the Kurgan region and in the north of the Omsk region, and also gravitate towards the state border with Kazakhstan.
Keywords
Cluster modeling,
the Ural‐Siberian sector of the forest‐steppe and steppe zones,
axes of advanced development,
cluster groups
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 20‐17‐00069 "Geographic foundations of the spatial development of agricultural post‐virgin regions of the Urals and Siberia".
About the Authors
A. A. Chibilev
Institute of the Steppe of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Chibilev
Orenburg
V. P. Petrishchev
Institute of the Steppe of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vadim P. Petrishchev
Orenburg
P. A. Kosykh
Institute of the Steppe of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Polina A. Kosykh, junior researcher, Department of Steppe and Nature Management
11 Pionerskaya St, Orenburg, 460000
Tel. +7(3532)774432
References
1. Akhmedova I.D., Dobryakova V.A. Prostranstvenno‐vremennoy analiz razmeshcheniya naseleniya i khozyaystva Tyumenskoy oblasti [Spatio‐temporal analysis of the distribution of the population and economy of the Tyumen region]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii v ramkakh IX ezhegodnoi nauchnoi assamblei Assotsiatsii rossiiskikh geografov‐obshchestvovedov «Sovremennye tendentsii prostranstvennogo razvitiya i prioritety obshchestvennoi geografii», Barnaul, 2018 [Materials of an international scientific conference in the framework of the IX annual scientific assembly of the Association of Russian geographers and social scientists “Modern trends in spatial development and priorities of social geography”, Barnaul, 2018]. Barnaul, 2018, pp. 247‐252. (In Russian)
2. Zhidkikh A.A. A brief overview of the types of territorial structure of the Altai Territory. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Altai State Agrarian University]. 2010, no. 5 (67), pp. 82‐91. (In Russian)
3. Subbotina L.V., Anisimova E.V. Current state and development trends of the economy of the Kurgan region. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals]. 2014, no. 5(123), pp. 93‐97. (In Russian)
4. Yangirov A.V., Mukhametova A.D., Rabtsevich A.A., Toktamysheva Yu.S., Akhunov R.R. Socio‐economic zoning of the territorial development of the region (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan). Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living standards of the population of the regions of Russia]. 2016, no. 3(201), pp. 167‐179. (In Russian)
5. Nefedova T.G., Treyvish A.I. Middle Ural meridian: polarization of the space of old industrial regions. Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva [News of the Russian Geographical Society]. 2020, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 3‐25. (In Russian)
6. Isachenko A.G. Western Siberia as an object of historical and geographical study and description. Article I. Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva [News of the Russian Geographical Society]. 2014, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 3‐20. (In Russian)
7. Isachenko A.G. Western Siberia as an object of historical and geographical study and description. Article II. Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva. [News of the Russian Geographical Society]. 2014, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 1‐29. (In Russian)
8. Belotserkovich D.V., Ryabtsun A.S. Territory of advanced socio‐economic development (TASED) on the example of the Khabarovsk Territory. Vestnik Khabarovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava [Bulletin of the Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law]. 2018, no. 2, pp. 31‐36. (In Russian)
9. Papelo V.N., Kovtun B.A. Formation of territories of advanced socio‐economic development. Sciences of Europe. 2016, no. 8(8), pp. 77‐83. (In Russian)
10. Baklanov P.Ya. Territories of advanced development: concept, structure, approaches to isolation. Regional'nye issledovaniya [Regional Studies]. 2014, no. 3, pp. 12‐19. (In Russian)
11. Ioffe G.V., Nefedova T.G. Center and periphery in agriculture of Russian regions. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Problems of forecasting]. 2001, no. 6, pp. 100‐110. (In Russian)
12. Treyvish A.I. Center, periphery and facade as complementary concepts of geosciences. Sotsial'no‐ekonomicheskaya geografiya. Vestnik Assotsiatsii rossiyskikh geografov‐obshchestvovedov [Socio‐economic geography. Bulletin of the Association of Russian Geographers and Social Scientists]. 2016, no. 5, pp. 4‐15. (In Russian)
13. Krupko A. E., Fetisov Yu. M, Nesterov Yu. A., Cherkashin A. K. Modeling a balanced socio‐economic development of social systems (on the example of the Central Chernozemnyy Region).Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya [Voronezh State University Bulletin. Series. Geography Geoecology]. 2016, no. 1, pp. 5‐16. (In Russian)
14. Cherkashin A.K. Polisistemnoe modelirovanie [Polysystem modeling]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2005, 279 p. (In Russian)
15. Chibilev A.A., Petrishchev V.P., Kosykh P.A., Levykin S.V. Indicators of socio‐economic development of municipalities in the steppe regions of European Russia. Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva [News of the Russian Geographical Society]. 2018, vol. 150, iss. 5, pp. 1‐14. (In Russian)
16. Chibilev A.A., Petrishchev V.P., Kosykh P.A., Levykin S.V. Cluster‐Based Differentiation of the Socioeconomic Development Level for Municipal Units of the Steppe Regions of European Russia. Regional Research of Russia, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 181‐192. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970519020023
17. Baburin V.L., Goryachko M.D. Strategic management of regional development: an economic‐geographical approach. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5: Geography]. 2009, no. 5, pp. 53‐58. (In Russian)
18. Gassiy V.V., Battuvshin G., Potravnyy I.M. Innovative approaches and technologies in the development of the regional economy: modern Russian practice. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta imeni G.V. Plekhanova [Bulletin of the Russian University of Economics. G.V. Plekhanov]. 2016, no. 1(85), pp. 130‐138. (In Russian)
19. Nizhegorodtsev R.M., Arkhipova M.Yu. Factors of economic growth of Russian regions: regression‐cluster analysis. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Vestnik UrFU. Series: Economics and Management]. 2009, no. 3, pp. 94‐110. (In Russian)
20. Feser E., Luger M. Cluster analysis as a mode of inquiry: its use in science and technology policy‐making in North Carolina. European planning studies, 2003, no. 11, pp. 11‐24. Available at: http://base.consultant.ru (accessed 28.07.2021)
21. Romesburg S. Cluster Analysis for Researchers. North Carolina, Lulu Press, 2004, 334 p.
22. Romanova E.A. Sotsial'no‐ekonomicheskaya obuslovlennost' sovremennogo landshaftogeneza osvoennykh territoriy [Socio‐economic conditionality of the modern landscape genesis of developed territories]. Moscow, INFRA‐M Publ., 2020, 151 p. (In Russian)
23. Zyryanov A.I. Landshaftnye rubezhi kontrastnosti i territorial'nye sotsial'no‐ekonomicheskie sistemy [Landscape boundaries of contrast and territorial socio‐economic systems]. Perm', Perm University Publ., 1995, 144 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Chibilev A.A., Petrishchev V.P., Kosykh P.A. Analysis of the geographical factors of sustainable development of municipalities in the south of the Urals and western Siberia. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2021;16(4):113‐126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-4-113-126
Views:
413
Email this article 
