LANDSCAPE APPROACH IN CITY-PLANNING
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2018-3-71-82
Abstract
Aim. The aim is to justify the application of the landscape approach in urban planning on the basis of theoretical concepts of landscape studies and the requirements of urban planning practices. Discussion. The basic scheme of the landscape approach is to study the natural and anthropogenic landscape as a complex geosystem consisting of a complex of various components which form the planning structure of the city. In territorial and urban planning, the structure and properties of natural and urban landscapes are revealed using functional, historical-genetic, morphotypic, geo-ecological and visual research methods. Abroad, a similar trend is called "landscape urbanism", the theoretical basis of which is based on the understanding that the best option for the organization of urban areas should be based on the landscape features of the city. With the use of the above-mentioned approaches, an urban landscape approach is being formed, a new nature-urban planning system which, in addition to natural complexes, includes man-made structures: buildings, infrastructure, parks and squares. If the natural landscape is a self-regulating geo-system, then the urban one is controlled by man. When taking actions to transform natural landscapes should be taken into account their structure and functioning, as well as the limits of possible impacts and the likely consequences of these changes. Conclusion. The demand for a landscape approach is constantly growing as a result of the significant transformation of modern cities, the replacement of architectural styles, the growth of urban space and communications, the desire to improve the quality of the urban environment and the comfort of the urban population.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the framework of fundamental scientific research programs of the State Academies of Sciences for 2013- 2020. "Eco-diagnostics, mapping of natural and anthropogenic landscapes and assessment of the efficiency of nature management in Russia at the regional and local levels". Reg. No. 01201352469 (0148-2014-0022)
About the Authors
Boris I. Kochurov
Institute of Geography of RAS, Moscow
Russian Federation
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
Professor, Doctor of Geographical Sciences, Leading Researcher
119017, Russia, Moscow, 29 Staromonetny pereulok.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Yulia A. Khaziakhmetova
Institute of Geography of RAS, Moscow
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Researcher
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Researcher
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Irina V. Ivashkina
State Unitary Enterprise «Moscow General Planning Research and Project Institute», Moscow
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Section leader
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Section leader
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ekaterina A. Sukmanova
Tver Suvorov Military School, Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Tver
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, teacher
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Russian Federation
Candidate of Geographical Sciences, teacher
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Kochurov B.I. Geoekologiya: ekodiagnostika i ekologo-khozyaistvennyi balans territorii [Geoecology: ecodiagnostics and eco-economic balance of territory]. Smolensk, Smolensk Humanitarian University Publ., 1989, 154 p. (In Russian)
2. Ivashkina I.V., Kochurov B.I. About approaches to urboecodiagnostics the Greater Moscow with a view of balanced development of its area. Ekologiya urbanizirovannykh territorii [Ecology of urban areas]. 2013, no. 2, pp. 6-15. (In Russian)
3. Kochurov B.I., Ivashkina I.V. Cityscapes of Moscow and their spatial transformation. Ekologiya urbanizirovannykh territorii [Ecology of urban areas]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 48-54. (In Russian)
4. Sukmanova E.A. Quantitative assessment of the modern anthropogenic pressure and stability of urban landscapes on the example of Tver. Problemy regional'noi ekologii [Regional Environmental Issues]. 2007, no. 3, pp. 29-35. (In Russian)
5. Gladkey A.V. Agglomeration synergy in globalization era. In: Geografiya: razvitie nauki i obrazovaniya [Geography: development of science and education]. St. Petersburg, 2016, part 1, pp. 34-38. (In Russian)
6. Krasilnikova E. [Landscape Urbanism: A New Look at the Old Problem]. Zelenyi gorod, 2014, no. 4(11), pp. 33-35. (In Russian) Available at: http://greencity.su/landshaftnyj-urbanizm-novyj-vzglyad-na-staruyuproblemu/. (accessed 05.07.2018)
7. Chistobaev A.I., Krasovskaya O.V., Skatershchikov S.V. Territorial'noe planirovanie na urovne sub"ektov Rossii [Territorial planning at the level of the subjects of Russia]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2010, 296 p.
8. Gutnov A.V. Mir arkhitektury [World of architecture]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 1985, 352 p. (In Russian)
9. Bocharov Yu.P, Lyubovnyi V.Ya. Gorod i proizvodstvo [City and production]. Moscow, Stroiizdat Publ., 1980, 125 p.
10. Smolyar I.M. General'nye plany novykh gorodov: Metodicheskoe posobie po proektirovaniyu [General plans of new cities: Methodical manual on designing]. Moscow, Stroiizdat Publ., 1973, 232 p. (In Russian)
11. Buchek A., Latsina Ya., Lev I., Zimova E. Territorial systems of ecologic landscape stability. [Studia Geographica]. 1985, no. 88, pp. 135-42.
12. Kinsht A.V. Peculiarities of the ecological training courses for city planners and architects. The development of professional culture. Arkhitekton: izvestiya vuzov [Architecton: proceedings of higher education institutions]. 2014, no. 4(48). Available at: http://archvuz.ru/2014_4/17 (accessed: 08.04.2018). (In Russian)
13. Sycheva A.V. Landshaftnaya arkhitektura: uchebnoe posobie dlya VUZov [Landscape architecture: textbook for high school]. Moscow, ONIKS XXI vek Publ., 2004, 87 p. (In Russian)
14. Arkhitekturnyi slovar' [Architectural dictionary]. Available at: http://www.c-cafe.ru/words/173/17221.php (accessed 10.01.2017).
15. Vernadskii V.I. Biosfera i noorsfera [Biosphere and noosphere]. Moscow, “Airis-press” Publ., 2012, 576 p. (In Russian)
16. Korogodin V.I., Korogodina V.L. Informatsiya kak osnova zhizni [Information as the basis of life]. Dubna, “Feniks” Publ., 2000, 208 p. (In Russian)
17. Google. Pictures. Available at: https://www.google.ru/. (accessed 05.07.2018)
18. Amurskaya S. Clever "sixties" of the twentieth century. Urban magazine. 2014, pp. 82-91.
19. Chistyakova S.B. Okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy [Protection of the environment]. Moscow, Stroiizdat Publ., 1988, 272 p.
20. Rodoman B.B. Landndscape polarization as a way to preserve of biosphere and recreational resources. In: Resursy, sreda, rasselenie [Resources, environment, resettlement]. Moscow, 1974, pp. 81-88.
21. Zalesskaya L.S., Mikulina E.M.Landshaftnaya arkhitektura [Landscape architecture]. Moscow, Stroiizdat Publ., 1979, 240 p.
22. Mikulina E.M., Blagovidova N.G. Arkhitekturnaya ekologiya [Architectural ecology]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2013. 256 p. (In Russian)
23. Zhirnov A.D. Iskusstvo parkostroeniya [Art of the park construction]. L’vov, Vishcha shkola Publ., 1977, 176 p.
Review
For citations:
Kochurov B.I., Khaziakhmetova Yu.A., Ivashkina I.V., Sukmanova E.A. LANDSCAPE APPROACH IN CITY-PLANNING. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2018;13(3):71-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2018-3-71-82
Views:
1654
Email this article 
