Segetal plants of agricultural landscapes of the Southern Non‐Chernozem zone as a source of biological resources
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2024-3-13
Abstract
Aim. To identify economically significant species of segetal plants of agrophytocenoses in the Southern Non‐Chernozem zone and assess their dynamics with changes in anthropogenic load.
The study was carried out by analysing geobotanical descriptions of agrophytocenoses in the Southern Non‐Chernozem Zone. The species diversity of economically important species was established during the period of extensive farming (1929–1933), the beginning of intensification (1936–1938), a high level of intensification (1981–1983), and a period of decreasing intensity of farming (2012–2022).
At all stages of the study, groups of forage, medicinal and honey plants were round to have a high species diversity. The presence of individual representatives of vegetable, vitamin, insecticidal and ornamental species in agrophytocenoses was established.
Changes in the nature and degree of anthropogenic pressure on agrophytocenoses has led to a significant transformation of species composition and abundance of representatives of economically significant groups. The smallest number of these was noted in the 1980s. Currently, species diversity has increased due to a decrease in the intensity of agriculture in the region.
About the Authors
A. N. NikolskiiRussian Federation
Aleksandr N. Nikolskii, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher, Department of Agronomy and Landscape Architecture
68 Bolshevistskaya St, Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, 430005. Теl. +79648528268
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. D. Bochkarev
Russian Federation
Vladimir D. Bochkarev
Saransk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. V. Bochkarev
Russian Federation
Dmitrii V. Bochkarev
Saransk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
K. O. Drozdova
Russian Federation
Kseniya O. Drozdova
Saransk
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Lososová Z., Simonová D. Changes during the 20th century in species composition of synanthropic vegetation in Moravia (Czech Republic). Preslia, 2008, vol. 80, pp. 291–305.
2. Meyer S., Wesche K., Krause B. Leuschner C. Dramatic losses of specialist arable plants in Central Germany since the 1950s/60s – a cross‐regional analysis. Diversity andDistributions, 2013. vol. 19, pp. 1175–1187. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12102
3. Dauber J., Jones M.B., Stout J.C. The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity. Gcb Bioenergy, 2010, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757‐1707.2010.01058.x
4. Storkey J., Moss S.R., Cussans J.W. Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Science, 2010, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS‐09‐096.1
5. Brooker R.W., Hawes C., Iannetta P.P., Karley A.J. Renard D. Plant diversity and ecological intensification in crop production systems. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2023, vol. 16, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtad015
6. Tikhomirov V.N., ed. Problemy izucheniya sinantropnoi flory SSSR [Problems of studying the synanthropic flora of the USSR]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, 89 p. (In Russian)
7. Ul'yanova T.N. Sornye rasteniya vo flore Rossii i sopredel'nykh gosudarstv [Weeds in the flora of Russia and neighboring countries]. Barnaul, AzBuka Publ., 2005, 297 p. (In Russian)
8. Luneva N.N. Issledovanie bioraznoobraziya v agrolandshaftakh [Research of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes]. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Innovations in life sciences», Belgorod, 24–26 maya 2023 [Proceedings of the V International Symposium "Innovations in life sciences", Belgorod, May 24–26, 2023]. Belgorod, 2023, pp. 152–154. (In Russian)
9. Luneva N.N. On the issue of preserving phytodiversity in the territories of agroecosystems. Phytodiversity of Eastern Europe, 2023, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 49–75. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.24412/2072‐8816‐2023‐17‐2‐49‐75
10. GBU "Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Penzenskoi oblasti". FR‐28‐ 37 (Lichnyi fond I. I. Sprygina) [The State Archive of the Penza region. I. I. Sprygin's Personal Fund)]. Available at: https://arhiv‐pnz.ru (accessed 20.01.2024)
11. Kuz'min P.K. Sornye rasteniya polei Mordovskoi ASSR i mery bor'by s nimi [Weeds of the fields of the Mordovian ASSR and measures to combat them]. Saransk, Mordovian State Publ., 1941, 230 p. (In Russian)
12. Balabaeva R.M., Smolin N.V. Dinamika zasorennosti posevov v usloviyakh Mordovii [Dynamics of crop contamination in the conditions of Mordovia]. Mezhvuz. sbornik nauchnyh trudov «Racionalnoe ispolzovanie zemelnyh resursov i povyshenie plodorodiya pochv» [Interuniversity collection of scientific papers "Rational use of land resources and improvement of soil fertility"]. Saransk, Mordovia University Publ., 1985, pp. 85–88. (In Russian)
13. Bochkarev D.V. Chronological transformation of the weed flora of agrophytocenoses at different levels of anthropogenic impact. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosagrouniversiteta im. N.I. Vavilova [Bulletin of Saratov State Agrarian University named after N.I. Vavilov]. 2013, no. 6, pp. 22–28. (In Russian)
14. Metody ucheta struktury sornogo komponenta v agrofitocenozah [Methods of accounting for the structure of the weed component in agrophytocenoses]. Persianovsky, Donskoy GAU Publ., 2018, 76 p. (In Russian)
15. Plants of the World Online (POWO). Available at: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (accessed: 18.02.2024)
16. Matveev N.M. Bioekologicheskij analiz flory i rastitel'nosti (na primere lesostepnoj i stepnoj zony) [Bioecological analysis of flora and vegetation (on the example of forest‐steppe and steppe zones)]. Samara, Samara National Research University named after academician S.P. Korolev Publ., 2006, 311 p. (In Russian)
17. Khan R., Khan M.A., Sultan S., Marwat K.B., Khan I., Hassan G., Shah H.U. Nutritional quality of sixteen terrestrial weeds for the formulation of cost‐effective animal feed. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 2013, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 75–79.
18. Kirilov A., Georgieva N., Stoycheva I. Determination of Composition and Palatability of Certain Weeds. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology, 2016, no. 2, pp. 41–43. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455‐815X.000013
19. Kumalasari N.R., Abdullah L., Khotijah L., Wahyuni L., Indriyani I., Ilman N., Janato F. Evaluation of Asystasia gangetica as a potential forage in terms of growth, yield and nutrient concentration at different harvest ages. Tropical Grasslands‐Forrajes Tropicales, 2020, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 153– 157. https://doi.org/10.17138/tgft(8)153‐157
20. Akinfemi A., Mako A.A. Assessment of nutritive value of four dominant weed species in North central Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 2012, vol. 24, no. 11. URL: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/11/akin24208.htm (accessed 20.08.2024)
21. Gutiérrez D., Mendoza S., Serrano V., Bah M., Pelz R., Balderas P., Leon F. Proximate composition, mineral content, and antioxidant properties of 14 Mexican weeds used as fodder. Weed Biology and Management, 2008, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445‐6664.2008.00307.x
22. Klein A.‐M., Boreux V., Fornoff F., Mupepele A.‐C., Pufal G. Relevance of wild and managed bees for human well‐being. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2018, vol. 26, pp. 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.02.011
23. Aizen M.A., Aguiar S., Biesmeijer J.C., Garibaldi L.A. et al. Global agricultural productivity is threatened by increasing pollinator dependence without a parallel increase in crop diversification. Global change biology, 2019, vol. 25, pp. 3516– 3527. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14736.
24. Schweiger O., Franzén M., Frenzel M., Galpern P., et al. Minimising risks of global change by enhancing resilience of pollinators in agricultural systems. Atlas of Ecosystem Services, Drivers, Springer, pp. 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐319‐96229‐0_17
25. Basset Y., Lamarre G.P.A. Toward a world that values insects. Science, 2019, vol. 364, pp. 1230–1231. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw7071
26. Fijen T.P.M., Scheper J.A., Boom T.M., Janssen N., Raemakers I., Kleijn D. Insect pollination is at least as important for marketable crop yield as plant quality in a seed crop. Ecology Letters, 2018, no. 21, pp. 1704–1713. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13150
27. Phillips B.B., Bullock J.M., Osborne J.L., Gaston K.J. Ecosystem service provision by road verges. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2020, vol. 57, no. 3. pp. 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365‐2664.13556
28. Barbercheck M.E., Wallace J. Weed–insect interactions in annual cropping systems. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2021, vol. 114, no. 2. pp. 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saab002
29. Gaba S., Cheviron N., Perrot T., Piutti S., Gautier J.L. Bretagnolle V. Weeds enhance multifunctionality in arable lands in south‐west of France. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2020, vol. 4, pp. 71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00071
30. Iyda J.H., Fernandes Â., Calhelha R.C., Alves M.J. et al. Nutritional composition and bioactivity of Umbilicus rupestris (Salisb.) Dandy: An underexploited edible wild plant. Food chemistry, 2019, vol. 295, pp. 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.139
31. Lachowicz S., Oszmiański J. Profile of bioactive compounds in the morphological parts of wild Fallopia japonica (Houtt) and Fallopia sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) and their antioxidative activity. Molecules, 2019, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071436
32. Ceccanti C., Landi M., Incrocci L., Pardossi A. et al. Comparison of Three Domestications and Wild‐Harvested Plants for Nutraceutical Properties and Sensory Profiles in FiveWild Edible Herbs: Is Domestication Possible? Foods, 2020, vol. 9, article id: 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081065
33. Zaynab M., Fatima M., Abbas S., Sharif Y., et al. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microbial pathogenesis, 2018, vol. 124, pp. 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.034
34. Lyubenova A., Georgieva L., Antonova V. Utilization of plant secondary metabolites for plant protection // Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2023, vol. 37. no. 1. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/13102818.2023.2297533?scroll=top&needAccess=true (accessed 21.02.2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2023.2297533
35. Jacobson M. Botanical pesticides: past, present, and future. ACS Symposium Series «Insecticides of Plant Origin». Washington: American Chemical Society, 1989. pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk‐1989‐0387.ch001
36. Isman M.B. Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop protection, 2000, vol. 19, no. 8‐10, pp. 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261‐2194(00)00079‐X
37. Nicolopoulou‐Stamati P., Maipas S., Kotampasi C., Stamatis P., Hens L. "Chemical pesticides and human health: the urgent need for a new concept in agriculture." Frontiers in public health. 2016, vol. 4. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/publichealth/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148/full. (accessed 21.02.2024) https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148
38. Suchkova A., Granica Y. The use of weeds in decorative gardening. Agriculture, 2019, no. 4, pp. 1–9. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33024 (accessed 06.04.2024). https://doi.org/10.7256/2453‐8809.2019.4.33024. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Nikolskii A.N., Bochkarev V.D., Bochkarev D.V., Drozdova K.O. Segetal plants of agricultural landscapes of the Southern Non‐Chernozem zone as a source of biological resources. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2024;19(3):132-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2024-3-13