Hydroecological limitations of the use of water resources of transboundary rivers of the steppe zone (through the example of the Ural and Tobol Rivers, Russia)
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2024-2-15
Abstract
To identify the main types of hydroecological restriction on the use of water resources and their spatial patterns in the Ural and Tobol river basins within the steppe zone.
A comprehensive assessment of the water‐environmental situation in the regions of the studied basins studied was carried out on the basis of the calculation of water‐environmental stress – the ratio of water intake and free flow (average long‐term flow minus ecological). To assess the environmental restrictions on water use, data from the State reports, “On the State and Protection of the Environment" were used. Exposure to the risk of flooding of settlements was analysed according to information from the registers of settlements at risk of flooding (flooding). Analysis of the dynamics of channel processes was carried out using Landsat satellite images. For the rivers of the Tobol River basin, an approach based on taking into account the nature of channel transformations in the sectors of the state border of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan was used.
As a result of the research, the main types of hydroecological restriction in the transboundary basins of the Ural and Tobol were identified. In particular, the key factor limiting water use is the availability of a guaranteed volume and adequate quality of water resources. Hydrological restrictions associated with the negative impact of water include the risks of flooding of settlements during the passage of spring or summer floods, as well as intensive riverbed transformations (in the Ural River basin).
The Ural and Tobol river basins (within the steppe zone) are characterised by the development of a rather complex hydroecological situation in some areas. Taking into account the long cycle of low water content in these rivers, the general hydroecological situation has aggravated in recent decades, the primary problem being that of guaranteed provision of water resources of standard quality. As a result, an urgent task is to develop an algorithm for a comprehensive assessment of hydroecological restrictions on water use and their consequences for the population and economy of the regions of the steppe zone.
About the Authors
Zh. T. SivohipRussian Federation
Zhanna Т. Sivoкhip, Candidate of Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Landscape Ecology
11 Pionerskay St, Orenburg, 460000
Tel. +79225591567
V. M. Pavleichik
Russian Federation
Vladimir M. Pavleichik
Orenburg
A. A. Chibilev
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Chibilev
Orenburg
Yu. A. Padalko
Russian Federation
Yuri A. Padalko
Orenburg
M. A. Kozlova
Russian Federation
Maria A. Kozlova
Moscow
O. B. Popova
Russian Federation
Olga B. Popova
Orenburg
References
1. Frolova N.L., Vorob'evskii I.B. Hydroecological restrictions of water use in the Irtysh basin. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 5. Geography]. 2011, no. 6, pp. 34–42. (In Russian)
2. Frolova N.L. Hydrological restrictions of nature management. Geografo-gidrologicheskie issledovaniya. Voprosy geografii [Geographic and hydrological research. Questions of geography]. 2012, no. 133, pp. 456–478. (In Russian)
3. Alekseevskii N.I., Anisimova L.A., Frolova N.L. Modern and expected limitations of nature management. Prirodoobustroistvo [Nature management]. 2009, no. 1, pp. 50–57. (In Russian)
4. Sivokhip Zh.T. Sustainable water use as a factor of hydroecological safety in the transboundary basin of the Ural river. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Orenburg State University]. 2016, vol. 195, no. 7, pp. 78–84. (In Russian)
5. Ogureeva G.N., ed. Zony i tipy rastitel'nosti Rossii i sopredel'nykh territorii. Karta masshtaba 1:8000000 [Zones and types of vegetation in Russia and adjacent territories. Map scale 1:8000000]. Moscow, Geographical Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University, St. Petersburg: V.L. Komarov Botanical Institute Publ., 1999. (In Russian)
6. Rybalsky N.G., Omelianenko V.A., Dumnova A.D., eds. Vodnye resursy i vodnoe khozyaistvo Rossii v 2017 godu: stat. sbornik [Water resources and water management of Russia in 2017: statistical collection]. Moscow, NIA-Nature Publ., 2018, 230 p. (In Russian)
7. Aidapkelov N.S., ed. Okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy i ustoichivoe razvitie Kazakhstana v 2013–2017 gg.: stat. sbornik [Environmental protection and sustainable development of Kazakhstan in 2013–2017: statistical collection]. Astana, 2018, 123 p. (In Russian)
8. Markin V.N. Determination of the environmentally acceptable impact on small rivers. Melioratsiya i vodnoe khozyaistvo [Melioration and water management]. 2005, no. 4, pp. 8–11. (In Russian)
9. Gosudarstvennyi doklad «O sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy Orenburgskoi oblasti» [State Report «On the state and environmental protection of the Orenburg Region»]. Orenburg, Government of the Orenburg region, 2007–2021. (In Russian)
10. Gosudarstvennyi doklad «O sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy Kurganskoi oblasti» [State Report «On the state and environmental protection of the Kurgan region»]. Kurgan, Government of the Orenburg region, 2007–2021. (In Russian)
11. Gosudarstvennyi doklad «O sostoyanii prirodnykh resursov i okruzhayushchei sredy Respubliki Bashkortostan» [State report «On the state of natural resources and the environment of the Republic of Bashkortostan»]. Ufa, Ministry of Nature Management and Ecology of the Republic of Bashkortostan, 2007–2021. (In Russian)
12. Doklad «Ob ekologicheskoi situatsii v Chelyabinskoi oblasti» [Report «On the environmental situation in the Chelyabinsk region»]. Chelyabinsk, Ministry of Ecology of the Chelyabinsk region, 2007–2021. (In Russian)
13. MChS Rossii. Glavnoe upravlenie po Kurganskoi oblasti [Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. The Main Directorate for the Kurgan region]. Available at: https://45.mchs.gov.ru / (accessed 25.01.2023)
14. Navodneniya v Rossii: operativnye dannye MChS o zatopleniyakh za 2013–2020. Nabor dannykh [Floods in Russia: operational data of the Ministry of Emergency Situations on flooding for 2013–2020. A data set]. Available at: https://www.data-in.ru/ (accessed 04.15.2022)
15. Ministerstvo po chrezvychainym situatsiyam Respubliki Kazakhstan [Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/emer (accessed 01.25.2023)
16. Davletgaliev S.K. Assessment of water resources of the Zhaiyk-Caspian basin by water management sites. Gidrometeorologiya i ekologiya [Hydrometeorology and Ecology]. 2011, no. 1, pp. 56–65. (In Russian)
17. Kozlova M.A., Sivokhip Zh.T. Assessment of water quality dynamics in the transboundary basin of the Ural River. Water economy of Russia: problems, technologies, management, 2022, no. 6, pp. 107–119. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.35567/19994508_2022_6_7
18. Pavleichik V.M., Sivokhip Zh.T. Ecological and hydrological situation in the basin of the Tanalyk river in the conditions of technogenic transformation of the natural environment in the Southern Trans-Urals. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra [News of the Samara Scientific Center]. 2013, vol. 15, no. 3(3), pp. 945–948. (In Russian)
19. Ezhemesyachnyi informatsionnyi byulleten' o sostoyanii okruzhayushchei sredy [Monthly newsletter on the state of the environment]. Kazhydromet. Available at: https://www.kazhydromet.kz/ru/ecology/ezhemesyachnyy-informacionnyy-byulleten-o-sostoyanii-okruzhayuscheysredy (accessed 25.01.2023)
20. Pavleichik V.M., Sivokhip Zh.T., Padalko Yu.A. Dynamics of riverbed evolution in the middle Ural River and natural management risks. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographical series, 2018, no. 5, pp. 36–44. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618050126
Review
For citations:
Sivohip Zh.T., Pavleichik V.M., Chibilev A.A., Padalko Yu.A., Kozlova M.A., Popova O.B. Hydroecological limitations of the use of water resources of transboundary rivers of the steppe zone (through the example of the Ural and Tobol Rivers, Russia). South of Russia: ecology, development. 2024;19(2):170-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2024-2-15