The contribution of individual characteristics of Anas and Aythya individuals to their susceptibility to low‐pathogenic avian influenza viruses in the south of Western Siberia

   Aim. Analysis of the influence of species, sex, and age of genus Anas and Aythya individuals on their sensitivity to low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (LPAIV) in the south of Western Siberia.

   Material and Methods. Infestation of ducks with the influenza virus was determined by cloacal swabs obtained from 5014 individuals of ducks belonging to the genus Anas and Aythya during the autumn migration period in the south of Western Siberia. Isolation of influenza A virus isolates was carried out according to standard WHO methods. The distribution of infected individuals was estimated with ꭓ². Relative risk (RR) was used to estimate the risk of infection for each individual species.

   Results. Among the examined ducks, the distribution between species differed between infected and uninfected individuals. The common teal was under greater risk of being infected with the avian influenza virus. In this species, the sex of the individual influenced the probability of infestation both in young individuals and the whole age spectrum.

   Conclusions. Individual characteristics of wild dabbling and diving ducks (species, sex, age) affect their infestation with low‐pathogenic avian influenza virus during the autumn migration period in the south of Western Siberia.

1. Kalonda A. et al. Avian influenza viruses detected in birds in sub‐Saharan Africa : a systematic review. Viruses, 2020, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 993. doi: 10.3390/v12090993

2. Schmaljohann H., Eikenaar C., Sapir N. Understanding the ecological and evolutionary function of stopover in migrating birds. Biological Reviews, 2022, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1231–1252. doi: 10.1111/brv.12839

3. Lycett S.J. et al. Genesis and spread of multiple reassortants during the 2016/2017 H5 avian influenza epidemic in Eurasia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, vol. 117, no. 34, pp. 20814–20825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001813117

4. Blagodatski A. et al. Avian influenza in wild birds and poultry: dissemination pathways, monitoring methods, and virus ecology. Pathogens, 2021, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 630. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050630

5. Wille M., Holmes E.C. The ecology and evolution of influenza viruses. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2020, vol. 10, no. 7, article id: a038489. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038489

6. Keawcharoen J. et al. Wild ducks as long‐distance vectors of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1). Emerging infectious diseases, 2008, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 600. DOI: 10.3201/eid1404.071016

7. Papp Z. et al. The ecology of avian influenza viruses in wild dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) in Canada. PloS one, 2017, vol. 12, no. 5, article id: e0176297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176297

8. Haase E., Sharp P.J., Paulke E. Seasonal changes in the concentrations of plasma gonadotropins and prolactin in wild Mallard drakes. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1985, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 301–305. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402340216

9. Deviche P., Parris J. Testosterone treatment to free‐ranging male dark‐eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) exacerbates hemoparasitic infection. The Auk. 2006, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 548–562.

10. European Food Safety Authority et al. Avian influenza overview May–September 2021. EFSA Journal, 2022, vol. 20, no. 1, article id: e07122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7122

11. Jax E. et al. Evaluating Effects of AIV Infection Status on Ducks Using a Flow Cytometry‐Based Differential Blood Count. Microbiology Spectrum, 2023, article id: e04351 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04351-22