The effect of short peptides on the growth and yield of soybeans
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2022-2-122-129
Abstract
Aim. Study of the effect of short di‐ and tetrapeptides (AB‐0, AE‐0) on the growth, development and productivity of Batya soybean varieties.
Material and Methods. Biologically active dipeptide AB‐0 and tetrapeptide AE‐0 were used. Field studies were carried out on meadow‐brown podzolized gley heavy loamy soil. One month before planting, soybean seeds were treated with dipeptide/tetrapeptide of concentrations of 0.01 g/l or 0.001 g/l. Hand‐tended and industrial‐level research was carried out.
Results. The use of dipeptide AB‐0 in a hand‐tended study had a positive effect on the growth processes of soybeans of the Batya variety compared to the control. The use of tetrapeptide AE‐0 in a hand‐tended study increased the weight of plants by 7.3‐67.0 g and plant height by 3.0‐9.0 cm compared to the control. The use of dipeptide AB‐0 and tetrapeptide AE‐0 increased the yield of soybeans by a maximum of 81.2‐83.7% compared to the control. The use of peptides AB‐0 and AE‐0 in an industrial‐level experiment increased the yield by 30.5% and 18.4%, respectively, compared with the control.
Conclusion. The short peptides AB‐0 and AE‐0 studied had an impact on the growth, development and productivity of Batya soybean varieties. They can be classified as plant growth regulators.
About the Authors
T. A. Aseeva
Far Eastern Agricultural Research Institute, Khabarovsk Federal Research Centre, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Aseeva, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Acting Director
13 Klubnaya St, Vostochnoe, Khabarovskiy region, 680521
Tel. +79241065299
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. Kh. Khavinson
St Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology;
Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Vladimir Kh. Khavinson
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. S., Mironova
St Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Mironova
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
G. A. Ryzhak
St Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Galina A. Ryzhak
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
N. A., Selezneva
Far Eastern Agricultural Research Institute, Khabarovsk Federal Research Centre, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Natalya A. Selezneva
Khabarovskiy region
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
T. N. Fedorova
Far Eastern Agricultural Research Institute, Khabarovsk Federal Research Centre, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Tamara N. Fedorova
Khabarovskiy region
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Persikova T.F. Produktivnost' bobovykh kul'tur pri lokal'nom vnesenii udobrenii [Productivity of leguminous crops with local fertilization]. Gorki, Belarusian State Agricultural Academy Publ., 2002, 204 p. (In Belarus)
2. Aseeva T.A. Assessment of agroclimatic resources of the Middle Amur region and their impact on the productivity of agricultural crops. Vestnik KrasGAU [Bulletin of KrasGAU]. 2008, no. 3, pp. 109- 113. (In Russian)
3. Sinegovskiy M.O. Perspectives of soybean production in the far east federal district. Vestnik of the Russian agricultural since, 2020, no. 1, pp. 13-16. (In Russian)
4. Sistema vedeniya agropromyshlennogo proizvodstva Primorskogo kraya [The system of conducting agro-industrial production in Primorsky Krai]. Novosibirsk, RAAS Publ., 2001, 363 p. (In Russian)
5. Drachev M.K., Vorontsov V.A., Babich N.N., Dzhabrailov A.A. Soybeans in the North-East of the Central Black Earth Region. Zernovoe khozyaistvo Rossii [Grain Economy of Russian]. 2013, no. 5, pp. 21-24. (In Russian)
6. Cao X.C., Chen X.Y., Li X.Y., Yuan L., Wu L.H., Zhu Y.H. Rice uptake of soil adsorbed amino acids under sterilized environment. Soil Biol Biochem, 2013, vol. 62, pp. 13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.018
7. Sauheitl L., Glaser B., Weigelt A. Uptake of intact amino acids by plants depends on soil amino acid concentrations. Environ Exp Bot., 2009, vol. 66, iss. 2, pp. 145-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.009
8. Liu H.J., Zhong X., Huang Y., Qiao C.C., Shao C., Li R., Shen Q.R. Production of free amino acid and short peptide fertilizer from rapeseed meal fermentation using Bacillus flexus NJNPD41 for promoting plant growth. Pedosphere, 2018, vol. 28, iss. 2, pp. 261- 268. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60012-8
9. Dalir N., Khoshgoftarmanesh A.H. Symplastic and apoplastic uptake and root to shoot translocation of nickel in wheat as affected by exogenous amino acids. J Plant Physiol., 2014, vol. 171, iss. 7, pp. 531-536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.12.011
10. Araya T., Miyamoto M., Wibowo J., Suzuki A., Kojima S., Tsuchiya Y.N., Sawa S., Fukuda H., Von Wiren N., Takahashi H. CLE- CLAVATA1 peptide-receptor signaling module regulates the expansion of plant root systems in a nitrogen-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 2029-2034. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319953111
11. Djordjevic M.A., Mohd-Radzman N.A., Imin N. Small-peptide signals that control root nodule number, development, and symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, vol. 66, iss. 17, pp. 5171-5181. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv357
12. Wang G., Zhang G., Wu M. CLE peptide signaling and crosstalk with phytohormones and environmental stimuli. Front Plant Sci., 2016, vol. 6, pp. 1211. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01211
13. Vanyushin B.F., Ashapkin V.V., Aleksandrushkina N.I. Regulatory peptides in plants. Biokhimiya [Biochemistry]. 2017, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 189-195. (In Russian)
14. Fedoreyeva L.I., Dilovarova T.A., Ashapkin V.V., Martirosyan Yu.Ts., Khavinson V.Kh., Kharchenko P.N., Vanyushin B.F. Short exogenous peptides regulate the expression of genes of the CLE, KNOX1 and GRF families in Nicotiana tabacum. Biokhimiya [Biochemistry]. 2017, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 700-709. (In Russian)
15. Khavinson V.Kh. Peptidy, genom, starenie [Peptides, genome, aging]. Moscow, RAS Publ., 2020, 58 p. (In Russian)
16. Fedoreyeva L.I., Smirnova T.A., Kolomijtseva G.Ya., Khavinson V.KH., Vanyushin B.F. Interaction of short peptides with FITC- labeled wheat histones and their complexes with deoxyribooligonucleotides. Biokhimiya [Biochemistry]. 2013, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 230-242. (In Russian)
17. Khavinson V.Kh., Lin'kova N.S., Tarnovskaya S.I. Short peptides regulate gene expression. Byulleten' ehksperimental'noi biologii i meditsiny [Byulleten eksperimental noj biologii mediciny]. 2016, no. 8, pp. 259-264. (In Russian)
18. Vanyushin B.F., Khavinson V.Kh. Short Biologically Active Peptides as Epigenetic Modulators of Gene Activity. Epigenetics – A Different Way of Looking at Genetics. W. Doerfler, P. Böhm (eds.). Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016, pp. 69- 90.
19. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta [Field experiment technique]. Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1985, 351 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Aseeva T.A., Khavinson V.Kh., Mironova E.S., Ryzhak G.A., Selezneva N.A., Fedorova T.N. The effect of short peptides on the growth and yield of soybeans. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2022;17(2):122-129. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2022-2-122-129
Views:
329
Email this article 
