Environmentally friendly protection of tea plantations in the south of Russia
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-4-27-36
Abstract
Aim. Environmentally safe protection of tea plantations in southern Russia during the revival of a previously prosperous industry and development of a strategy for the development of biological protection of tea growing in the long term which requires the integration of science and production.
Material and Methods. Pest contamination of the plantation was detected during phytosanitary surveys. The number of individual pests per unit area is calculated according to the Shapiro method. Studies of the effectiveness of the Australian ladybird beetle cryptolemus (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.) in relation to tea pulvinaria were carried out on tea plantations in the Lazarevsky district of Sochi.
Result. Justifications are given for the need to provide scientific support during work on farmland when developing environmentally safe protection of tea from pests and diseases. The results of surveys of tea plantations of the Black Sea coast of the Krasnodar Territory on the identification of the most dangerous pests for the yield of plantations together with the study of the effectiveness of cryptolemus in relation to tea pulvinaria (cottony camellia scale) in tea culture are given. As a result of the studies, the methodology, norms and multiplicity of the release of the cryptolaemus predator (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls.) were worked out, both in the larval and imago stages, with heavily infested tea plants. The research was carried using the material and technical facilities of the unique scientific installation, State Collection of Living entomoacariphages and entomopathogens.
Conclusion. The revival of tea plantations involves a set of measures aimed at increasing productivity: improving the system of cutting bushes and methods of collecting leaf, repairing, irrigating and fertilizing and mechanizing work on plantations. The use of environmentally friendly methods of protection against the most harmful objects allows the obtaining of tea raw materials of the highest quality.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. V. KashutinaRussian Federation
Evgeniya V. Kashutina, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher
77 Sochinskoe St, Sochi, 354200
Tel. +79054753513
L. N. Bugaeva
Russian Federation
Ludmila N. Bugaeva
Sochi
T. N. Ignateva
Russian Federation
Tatyana N. Ignateva
Sochi
I. V. Heishho
Russian Federation
Irina V. Heishho
Sochi
References
1. Baliev A. Svoi kust slashche. Na Yuge Rossii vosstanavlivaetsya chaevodstvo «Rossiiskaya biznes‐gazeta» [Your bush is sweeter. Tea growing in the South of Russia is restored “Rossiyskaya biznes‐gazeta”]. 2012, no. 4 (833). (In Russian) Available at: https://rg.ru/2012/01/31/chai.html (Accessed 12.03.2021)
2. Gvasalia M.V. Potential use of tea plants (Camellia Siensis (L.) Kuntze) in ornamental gardening. Subtropicheskoe i dekorativnoe sadovodstvo [Subtropical and ornamental gardening]. 2017, no. 63, pp. 209‐214. (In Russian)
3. Lyashko M.U., Gresis V.O. Using the technology of organic agriculture on tea plantations on the Black Sea coast of the Krasnodar Territory. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy agropromyshlennogo kompleksa [Theoretical and applied problems of the agro‐industrial complex]. 2016, no. 4(29), pp. 8‐12. (In Russian)
4. Platonova N.B., Belous O.G. Brief history of the introduction and development of tea growing in Russia. Sience of Europe. 2016, no. 2‐2(2), pp. 91‐95. (In Russian)
5. Ryndin A.V., Tuov M.T. [Scientific provision of tea growing in Russia and priority areas of research for the further development of the industry]. In: Nauchnye trudy «Subtropicheskoe i yuzhnoe sadovodstvo Rossii» [Scientific works Subtropical and southern horticulture of Russia]. Sochi, 2010, vol. 1, iss. 43, pp. 6‐10. (In Russian)
6. Govorushchenko N.V. [State and Ways of Solving Problems of Tea Growing in Subtropics of Russia]. In: Nauchnye trudy «Subtropicheskoe i yuzhnoe sadovodstvo Rossii» [Scientific works Subtropical and southern horticulture of Russia]. Sochi, 2010, vol. 1, iss. 43, pp. 3‐6. (In Russian)
7. Tuov I.A., Prokopenko S.V., Dobezhina M.T. [Features of selection, introduction and variety study of tea in the subtropics of Russia]. In: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov «110 let v subtropikakh Rossii» [Collection of Scientists “Works 110 years in the subtropics of Russia”]. Sochi, 2004, part 2, pp. 242‐254. (In Russian)
8. Vavilov L.V. Izmenchivost' zimostoikosti rastenii chaya v usloviyakh potepleniya zimnego perioda v Adygee [Variability of winter resistance of tea plants in the conditions of winter warming in Adygea. Fundamental and applied aspects of geology, geophysics and geoecology using modern information technologies]. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno‐prakticheskoi konferentsii «Fundamental'nye i prikladnye aspekty geologii, geofiziki i geoekologii s ispol'zovaniem sovremennykh informatsionnykh tekhnologii», Maikop, 20‐24 maya 2019 [Materials of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference "Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Using Modern Information Technologies", Maykop, 20‐24 May, 2019]. Maykop, 2019, pp. 99‐107. (In Russian)
9. Mamedov D.F., Narimanova R.O., Abbasova G.Yu., Popova O.I., Popova M.I. Development of an intelligent information system for growing tea plantations in mountain regions. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Sistemnyi analiz i informatsionnye tekhnologii [Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: System Analysis and Information Technology]. 2021, no. 1, pp. 112‐125. (In Russian)
10. Tryapicyn V.A., Schapiro V.A., Shchepetil'nikova V.A. Parazity i khishchniki vreditelei sel'skokhozyaistvennykh kul'tur [Parasites and predators of crop pests] Leningrad, Kolos Publ., 1982, 256 p. (In Russian)
11. Borchsenius N.S. Prakticheskii opredelitel' koktsid (Coccoidea) kul'turnykh rastenii i lesnykh porod SSSR [Practical determinant of coccides (Coccoidea) of cultivated plants and forest breeds of the USSR]. Moscow‐Leningrad, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1963, 311 p. (In Russian)
12. Dantzig E.M. To the nomenclature and distribution of some harmful species of coccides (Homoptera, Coccoidea ). Entomologicheskoe obozrenie [Entomological Review]. 1977, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 99‐102. (In Russian)
13. Bartlett B.R., et al. Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds : a world review. USDA, 1978, Washington, D.C., 545 p.
14. Muma M.H. Factors contributing to the natural control of citrus insects and mites in Florida. J. Econ. Ent. 1955, vol. 48, pp. 432‐438.
15. Gomez‐Clemente F. The present situation in the biological control of some citrus scale (Planococcus citri and lcerya purchase). Bol. Patol. Veg. Ent. Agric. 1954, vol. 19, pp. 19‐35.
16. Mineo G. On Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. (Observation on morphology and bionomics). Bool. 1st Ent. Agric. Fitopath. Palermo, 1967, vol. 6, pp. 99‐143.
17. Chumakova B.M. [Was cryptolemus acclimatized on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus?]. In: Trudy VIZR [Proceedings of the All‐Russian Scientific Research Institute for Plant Protection]. Leningrad, 1949, 2 p. (In Russian)
18. Bugayeva L.N., Kashutina E.V., Slobodyanyuk G.A., Ignatieva T.N. The results of many years of research into the effectiveness of cryptolemus ‐ the entomophage of pests of agricultural and ornamental crops. Subtropicheskoe i dekorativnoe sadovodstvo [Subtropical and ornamental gardening]. 2015, vol. 53, pp. 133‐14. (In Russian)
19. Bugaeva L.N., Kashutina E.V., Ignatieva T.N. Kashutin E.N. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po massovomu razvedeniyu i primeneniyu khishchnogo zhuka kriptolemusa (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mals.) dlya bor'by s chervetsami i pul'vinariyami [Methodological guidelines for the mass breeding and use of the predatory cryptolemus beetle (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mals.)]. Sochi, «Tuapsinskaya tipografiya», 2013, 31 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kashutina E.V., Bugaeva L.N., Ignateva T.N., Heishho I.V. Environmentally friendly protection of tea plantations in the south of Russia. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2021;16(4):27‐36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-4-27-36