The use of a risk‐orientated approach in comprehensive assessment of natural and technogenic emergency situations in the Kashirsky Municipal District of the Voronezh Region, Russia
T. V. Ovchinnikova,
N. D. Razinkov,
P. S. Kuprienko,
T. V. Ashikhmina,
A. V. Shmygol,
A. A. Pavlenko https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-3-127-141
Abstract
The article reviews methodological approaches to risk assessment based on a comprehensive analysis of the frequency of natural and technological hazards in the territory of the Kashirsky Municipal District of the Voronezh Region.
Aim. The purpose of this article is to assess and calculate the risks of emergency situations, based on a comprehensive analysis of the frequency of occurrence of natural and technological hazards in the Kashirsky Municipal District of the Voronezh Region, Russia.
Methods. The risk assessment methods employed were based on the combined characteristics of damage and frequency of occurrence of negative environmental or man‐caused processes or hazardous events. Events associated with certain losses or people impacted upon by dangers were considered as negative processes.
Results. The Kashirsky Municipal District is exposed to high risks of flooding, wildfires, biological and social processes, hazards associated with certain housing and communal service regimes and transportation accidents. There are also hydraulic structures and potentially hazardous facilities which increase risks of property damage in the area.
Conclusion. It is necessary to reduce the level of social risk by carrying out preventive activities aimed at minimizing casualties. All scheduled maintenance requirements should be complied with in order to prevent a rise of risk of accident in life sustaining systems and infrastructures. The development of governmental departmental emergency monitoring systems, quarantine procedures and timely observational measures are recommended with the objective of reducing potential biological and social emergencies.
About the Authors
T. V. Ovchinnikova
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Ovchinnikova, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Technosphere Safety and Fire Safety
84, 20‐letiya Oktyabrya St, Voronezh, 394006
Tel. +79204669695
N. D. Razinkov
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay D. Razinkov
Voronezh
P. S. Kuprienko
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel S. Kuprienko
Voronezh
T. V. Ashikhmina
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Ashikhmina
Voronezh
A. V. Shmygol
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia V. Shmygol
Voronezh
A. A. Pavlenko
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Pavlenko
Voronezh
References
1. Ovchinnikova Т.V., Kuprienko P.S., Smolyaninov V.М., et al. Shagi resheniya kontseptsii «Bezopasnyi region» [Steps to Solving the Safe Region Concept]. Voronezh, Cifrovaya Poligrafia Publ., 2018, 333 p. (In Russian)
2. Faleev M.I., ed. Upravlenie riskami tekhnogennykh katastrof i stikhiinykh bedstvii (posobie dlya rukovoditelei organizatsii) [Management of Technogenic Risk and Disasters (Organization Leaders Manual)]. Moscow, 2016, 270 p. (In Russian)
3. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 17.08.2016 No.806 "On the application of a risk‐based approach in the organization of certain types of state control (supervision) and amendments to some acts of the Russian Federation". (In Russian)
4. Order of Rostechnadzor dated 11.04.2016, no. 144, Safety Guide "Methodical bases on conducting hazards analysis and accident risk assessment at hazardous production facilities". (In Russian)
5. GOST R 55059‐2012 BChS. Menedzhment riska chrezvychainoi situatsii. Terminy i opredeleniya [GOST R 55059‐2012 BCHS. Emergency Risk Management. Terms and Definitions]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2018, 13 p. (In Russian)
6. GOST R 22.10.02‐2016 BChS. Menedzhment riska chrezvychainoi situatsii. Dopustimyi risk chrezvychainoi situatsii [GOST R 22.10.02‐2016 BCHS. Emergency Risk Management. Acceptable Risk of Emergency]. Moscow, Standartinform Publ., 2019, 18 p. (In Russian)
7. Methodologies for assessing the risks of emergency situations and standards for acceptable risk of emergency situations. Approved by First Deputy Minister of Russian EMERCOM, R.H. Calikov, dated 09.01.2008, No.1‐4‐60‐9. (In Russian)
8. Ragozin А.L., ed. Otsenka i upravlenie prirodnymi riskami. Tematicheskii tom [Assessment and Management of Natural Risks. Thematic Tome]. Moscow, KRUK Publ., 2003, 320 p. (In Russian)
9. Order of Russian EMERCOM dated 08.07.2004, No.329 "On the approval of emergency information criteria" (In Russian)
10. Order of Russian EMERCOM dated 04.11.2004, No.506 "On approval of a standard safety data sheet for a hazardous facility" (reg. by Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation dated 22.12.2004 No. 6218). (In Russian)
11. Order of Rostechnadzor dated 29.03.2016, No.120 «On approval of the methodology for determining the amount of damage that may be caused to life, health of individuals, property of individuals and legal entities as a result of an accident in a hydraulic structure (except for navigable and port hydraulic engineering structures)". (In Russian)
12. Federal law dated 27.12.2002, No.184‐FZ (29.07.2017 edition) "On technical regulating" (In Russian)
13. Federal law dated 22.07.2008, No.123‐FZ (29.07.2017 edition) "Technical regulations for fire safety requirements" (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Ovchinnikova T.V., Razinkov N.D., Kuprienko P.S., Ashikhmina T.V., Shmygol A.V., Pavlenko A.A. The use of a risk‐orientated approach in comprehensive assessment of natural and technogenic emergency situations in the Kashirsky Municipal District of the Voronezh Region, Russia. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2021;16(3):127‐141. https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-3-127-141
Views:
378
Email this article 
