Spatial assessment of the socio‐economic framework of the Russian steppe regions

Aim. The goal of the study is a spatial assessment of the socio-economic framework in the steppe regions of Russia. Characteristics of the density of the socio-ecological framework and the degree of development of its core cities were represented to achieve the goal.

Material and Methods. A methodology is proposed for assessing the level of development of the socio-economic framework based on the conjugate analysis of 6 indicators of the density index of the socio-economic framework and 9 indicators of the developmental index of the core cities of the socio-economic framework for 18 steppe regions of Russia.

Results. A schematic map representing the spatial distribution of the indices studied was produced. A range of urbanisation process features in the regions of the steppe zone of Russia was revealed. In the eastern part, the formation of megalopoli is difficult and the development of agglomeration processes is hampered by the considerable distance from each other of large core cities. Highly urbanised territories might be formed in the western part of the region studied in the course of advanced development. In this connection, disproportions in density indices of the socio-economic framework between the southwest and east regions are noted. Maximum values (4 and more) are recorded in the Belgorod Oblast, Krasnodar Territory, the Republic of Adygea and the Republic of Crimea and minimum (less than 2.5) in border and remote regions (Altai Territory, Novosibirsk, Omsk, Kurgan, Orenburg Oblasts and the Republic of Kalmykia).

Conclusion. The development of the socio-economic framework in the mezoregion studied is a mirror reflection of the spatial arrangement of economy and population in the steppe zone of Russia. It is confirmed by a close relation between the development index of core cities in the socio-economic framework and the value of gross regional product. According to the Chaddock scale, the coefficient of correlation between appropriate indicators is 0.94.

1. Mikheeva N.N. pAn assessment of scenarios of a spatial development of the Russian economy to 2030]. In: Nauchnye trudy: institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN [Scientific works: Institute of National-Economical Forecasting RAS]. 2017, vol. 15, pp. 405-423. (In Russian)

2. Baklanov P.Ya. Territorial'nye struktury khozyaistva v regional'nom upravlenii [Territorial structures of economy in the regional management]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007, 239 p. (In Russian)

3. Druzhinin А.G., Shuvalov V.Е. Teoriya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi geografii: spektr sovremennykh vzglyadov [Theory of social-economical geography: the spectrum of modern views]. Rostov-on-Don, South Federal University Publ., 2010, 166 p. (In Russian)

4. Baransky N.N. [On economical-geographical studies of cities]. In: Voprosy geografii [Questions of geography]. 1946, iss. 2, pp. 19-62. (In Russian)

5. Maergoyz I.М. Territorial structure of national economy and some approaches of its study in the socialist countries in the light of socialist economical integration. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Moscow university]. 1975, no. 4, pp. 3-12. (In Russian)

6. Lappo G.М. A concept of an urban framework of the territorial structure of national economy: development, theoretical and practical meaning. Izvestiya akademii nauk SSSR. Seriya geograficheskaya [Izvestiya of Academy of sciences USSR. Geographic series]. 1983, no. 5, pp. 16-28. (In Russian)

7. Lappo G.М. Geografiya gorodov [Geography of cities]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 1997, 480 p. (In Russian)

8. Polyan P.М. An urban framework of settling in the Caucasian region. Izvestiya akademii nauk SSSR. Seriya geograficheskaya [Izvestiya of Academy of sciences USSR. Geographic series]. 1984, no. 2, pp. 38-46. (In Russian)

9. Polyan P.М., Treivish А.I. Territorial structures in science and practice. Novoe v zhizni, nauke, tekhnike [The new in life, science, techniques]. 1988, no. 12, pp. 1-48. (In Russian)

10. Polyan P.М. Territorial'nye struktury – urbanizatsiya – rasselenie: teoreticheskie podkhody i metody izucheniya [Territorial structures – urbanization – settling; theoretical approach and methods of the study]. Moscow, New Chronicle Publ., 2014, 785 p. (In Russian)

11. Treivish А.I. Gorod, raion, strana i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda [A city, region, country and world. A development of Russia by a country-scientist’s point of view]. Moscow, New Chronicle Publ., 2009, 373 p. (In Russian)

12. Treivish A.I., Zotova M.V., Savchuk I.G. Types of cities in Russia and across the globe. Regional Research of Russia, 2014, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 90-94. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970514020129

13. Regiony Rossii. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli [Regions of Russia. Social-economical indicators]. Moscow, Rosstat Publ, 2018, 1162 p. (In Russian)

14. Regiony Rossii. Osnovnye sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie pokazateli gorodov [The principal social-economical indicators of cities]. Moscow, Rosstat Publ, 2018, 443 p. (In Russian)

15. Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Differential urbanisation in Russia. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2003, vol. 94, iss. 1, pp. 75-88. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9663.00238

16. Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Urbanization and seasonal deurbanization in modern Russia. Regional Research of Russia, 2019, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 1-11. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970519010088