CURRENT STATE AND PROBLEMS OF MODERNIZATION OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK OF REGIONS OF THE STEPPE ZONE OF EUROPEAN RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2019-1-117-125
Abstract
Aim. The aim of the study is to assess the current state of the elements of the naturalecological framework of the steppe regions of European Russia and the peculiarities of its spatial distribution.
Discussion. The most important component of the environmental framework of the steppe regions of European Russia is the system of relatively large zonal landscape areas of the nature reserve fund which contribute to the preservation of biodiversity, the functional integrity of landscapes and the development of ecological networks. As of January 1, 2018, the natural reserve fund of the federal level in the territory of the considered mezoregion is represented by 22 specially protected natural territories (10 reserves, 5 national parks and 7 wildlife sanctuaries) with a total area of 16.1 thousand km2. The share of the area of specially protected natural reservation is about 2% of the area of the considered mezoregion. Practically for all the regions under consideration, there is a situation where numerous natural territories with “prospective” status are considered for integration into the nature reserve fund; however, the efforts of the scientific community, environmental services and relevant ministries are not very active in implementing projects to give them corresponding status.
Conclusion. For the territory stretching from the northern border of the Saratov region to the central part of the Krasnodar Territory, the problem of the absence of cores and key elements constituting the framework of the nature reserve fund is most acute. In six territorial subjects of the Mesoregion, there are no specially protected natural steppe reservations of the federal level. The analysis of modern territorial planning schemes of the steppe regions indicates that the environmental framework of European Russia has not yet become the basis for the adoption of urban planning decisions. At the same time, its structural elements (preserved zonal landscapes, natural and derived landscape complexes), along with autonomously functioning nature-like territorial complexes, will help create a favorable environment for the population.About the Authors
A. A. Chibilyov (jr.)Russian Federation
Alexander A. Chibilyov (junior), head of socio-economic geography department, candidate of economy sciences
Orenburg
A. A. Chibilyov
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Chibilyov, head research officer of the Landscape ecology department, scientific director, RAS academician
460000, Orenburg, Pionerskaya St., 11
References
1. Chistobaev A.I. [Spatial planning in Russia: state, problems, tasks of geographers]. Vestnik ARGO, 2013, no. 2, pp. 15-24. (In Russian) Available at: http://argorussia.ru/sites/default/files/filenode/%D0%92%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D0%90%D0%A0%D0%93%D0%9E%202013.pdf). (accessed 02.07.2018)
2. Yakovleva S.I. Wireframe in regional schemes of territorial planning. Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal [Pskov regional journal]. 2013, no. 15, pp. 15-25. (In Russian)
3. Chibilev A.A. Land fund structure and formation of unused lands in the European part of Russia steppe zone regions. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [Advances in current natural sciences]. 2017, no. 10, pp. 127-133. (In Russian)
4. Chibilev A.A. Development processes' specifics and dynamics of the urbanization in regions in the European part of Russia steppe zone. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya [Advances in current natural sciences]. 2017, no. 11, pp. 146-152. (In Russian)
5. Chibilev A.A. History and current state of nature conservation in Russia. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk [Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2017, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 231-241. (In Russian)
6. Kotlyakov V.M., Tishkov A.A., eds. Strategicheskie resursy i usloviya ustoichivogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii i ee regionov [Strategic resources and conditions for sustainable development of the Russian Federation and its regions]. Moscow, Institute of geography of RAS Publ., 2014, 166 p. (In Russian)
7. Gosudarstvennyi doklad «O sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2016 godu» [State report "On the state and environmental protection of the Russian Federation in 2016"]. Moscow, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation Publ., 2017, 760 p. (In Russian)
8. Gosudarstvennyi (natsional'nyi doklad) o sostoyanii i ispol'zovanii zemel' v Rossiiskoi federatsii v 2015 godu [State report "On the state and use of land in Russian Federation in 2015”]. Moscow, Ministry of economic development of the Russian Federation Publ., 2016, 202 p. (In Russian)
9. Kochurov B.I., Khaziakhmetova Y.A., Ivashkina I.V., Sukmanova E.A. Landscape approach in city-planning. South of Russia: ecology, development, 2018, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 71-82. (In Russian) Doi: 10.18470/1992-1098-2018-3-71-82
10. Kochurov B.I., Ivashkina I.V. Cityscapes of Moscow and their spatial transformation. Ekologiya urbanizirovannykh territorii [Ecology of Urban Areas]. 2015, no. 2, pp. 48-54. (In Russian)
11. Krasil'nikova E.Е. Landscape urbanism: a new look at the old problem. Zelenyi gorod, 2014, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 33-35. (In Russian) Available at: https://issuu.com/alexanderandrianov/docs/green_11_green (accessed 12.08.2018)
Review
For citations:
Chibilyov (jr.) A.A., Chibilyov A.A. CURRENT STATE AND PROBLEMS OF MODERNIZATION OF ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK OF REGIONS OF THE STEPPE ZONE OF EUROPEAN RUSSIA. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2019;14(1):117-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2019-1-117-125