DIFFERENTIATION OF STRUCTURE LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2019-1-94-104
Abstract
Aim. To identify the degree of influence of the morphological heterogeneity of the territory on the ecological state of the agricultural landscape.
Methods The study was conducted on an area of 608.5 hectares and a horizontal dissection factor of 8.36 km/km2. For the observations, distributed test pads measuring 10 m2 were used. On each type of facies, test sites were laid on arable land in triplicate. We used standard research methods using GIS. Existing thematic terrain maps were digitized and a digital elevation model based on a topographic survey of the terrain was created. Calculations and visualization of data are made using and based on the ArcGIS and Microsoft Excel software.
Results. The degree of influence of the types of facies of the landscape area on individual criteria and indicators of arable land productivity (microclimatic indicators, water properties of the soil, elements of fertility) has been established. Spatial ecologically justified differentiation of types of tracts into facies types has been carried out.
Main conclusions. The slopes of the northern exposure (I-IVn) have the highest ecological stability. They lead in the content of productive moisture, mobile phosphorus and potassium. The facies of the slopes of the southern exposure (I-IVs) lead by insolation, the content of humus and nitrate nitrogen. The content of heavy metals in the soils and wheat yield is higher on the southern slopes and second-order watersheds (IVn). The maximum productivity of 2.9 t/ha was obtained on the watershed type of facies (V). A close relationship was established (r = -0.72) between productivity and pH of soil, medium – with mobile forms of phosphorus (r = 0.59) and potassium (r = 0.84).
About the Authors
I. F. MedvedevRussian Federation
Ivan F. Medvedev, Doctor of agricultural sciences, Professor, chief researcher, Department of agrolandscape ecology
Saratov
D. I. Gubarev
Russian Federation
Denis I. Gubarev, Candidat of agricultural sciences, leading researcher Department of agrolandscape ecology
Saratov
S. S. Derevyagin
Russian Federation
Sergey S. Derevyagin, Candidat of agricultural sciences, deputy director for science
410010, Saratov, Tulaikov Street, 7
Scopus Author ID: 57200366078
M. Yu. Nesvetaev
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Nesvetaev, junior researcher, Department of agrolandscape ecology
Saratov
A. Yu. Verin
Russian Federation
Alexander Yu. Verin, junior researcher Department of agrolandscape ecology
Saratov
N. V. Mishchenko
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Mishchenko, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor
Vladimir
References
1. Solntsev N.A. Uchenie o landshafte (izbrannye trudy) [The doctrine of landscape (selected works)]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2001, 384 p. (In Russian)
2. Pomazkova N.V., Abakumova V.Y. Analysis of the Role of Topography in the Spatial Differentiation of Landscapes Using Geoinformation and Statistical Methods. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2018, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 137-149. Doi: 10.1134/S1995425518020099
3. Zhidkin A.P., Gennadiev A.N., Koshovskii T.S., Chendev Yu.G. Spatio-temporal parameters of the lateral migration of solid-phase soil matter (Belgorod Region). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 5, Geography]. 2016, no. 3, pp. 9-17. (In Russian)
4. Konovalova T.I., Plyusnin V.M. Development of the Geosystem Mapping Methodology. Geography and Natural Resources, 2018, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 197-203. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372818030022
5. Makarov V.Z., Novakovskii B.A., Chumachenko A.N. Ekologo-geograficheskoe kartografirovanie gorodov [Ecological and geographical mapping of cities]. Moscow, Nauchnyi mir Publ., 2002, 196 p. (In Russian)
6. Medvedev I.F., Anisimov D.A., Bochkov A.A., Orlova I.A. The relief features of redistribution of available moisture on the black soils during its freezing – defrosting. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosagrouniversiteta imeni N.I. Vavilova [Bulletin of the Saratov State Agrarian University named after N.I. Vavilova]. 2012, no. 11, pp. 25-30. (In Russian)
7. Medvedev I.F., Gubarev D.I., Grafov V.P. Facial Differentiation of Land Resources as a Basis for Promotion of the Ecologization of Agrolandscapes. Zemledelie [Zemledelie]. 2018, no. 1, pp. 10-15. (In Russian)
8. Marchetti A., Piccini C., Francaviglia R., Mabit L. Spatial distribution of soil organic matter using geostatistics: a key indicator to assess soil degradation status in Central Italy. Pedosphere, 2012, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 230-242. Doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60010-1
9. Bonten L.T.C., Römkens P.F.A.M., Brus D.J. Contribution of Heavy Metal Leaching from Agricultural Soils to Surface Water Loads. Environmental Forensics, 2008, vol. 9, iss. 2-3, pp. 252-257. Doi: 15275920802122981
10. Derevyagin S.S., Medvedev I.F., Nazarov V.A., Zelenova A.N., Sineltsev A.A., Zelenov V.A. Interrelation between climatic changes and content of heavy metals in chernozem soils of Saratov oblast Russia. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 2017, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 1691-1696.
Review
For citations:
Medvedev I.F., Gubarev D.I., Derevyagin S.S., Nesvetaev M.Yu., Verin A.Yu., Mishchenko N.V. DIFFERENTIATION OF STRUCTURE LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2019;14(1):94-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2019-1-94-104