EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TODAY: A PROBLEM AREA FOR OVERCOMING DIFFICULTIES OF PEDAGOGICAL ADAPTATION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF A HIGHER SCHOOL)
https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2018-3-159-166
Abstract
Aim. The aim of this study is to structure the problem areas of pedagogical adaptation of the content of the concept of sustainable development into the practice of Russian higher education. Methods. Analysis, synthesis and generalization of some relevant works, including foreign ones, in this field were used as research methods, as well as the results of many years of professional pedagogical activity of the authors (pedagogical observation, peer review, pedagogical interpretation). Results. The findings of the research are the identification of the problem areas for overcoming the difficulties of pedagogical adaptation of the principles of education for sustainable development in the practice of the Russian higher school. Conclusions. The findings of the study include the problems of pedagogical adaptation of content and methods of effective education for sustainable development, such as: 1) the inconsistency of the content tendencies of higher education in relation to objective needs of the society and politics that contradict sustainable development as a whole; 2) the problem of insufficient methodological support to develop critical thinking in students in the process of environmental education, as well as the pedagogical problem of the formation of students' reflexive experience; 3) the problem of "locality" and "targeting" of the content and methods of education for sustainable development; 4) the problem of developing inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary approaches for the education for sustainable development; 5) the problem of pedagogical adaptation of the axiological foundations of education for sustainable development.
About the Authors
Yulia M. GrishaevaRussian Federation
doctor of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor at the Department of ecology (academic title), Professor of physical geography, environmental management and methods of teaching geography, Faculty of geography and ecology, Moscow Region State University
+79169099369, Mytishchi, Vera Voloshina str., 24, Moscow region, 141014 Russia
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest
Irina V. Wagner
Russian Federation
doctor of pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest
Zinaida N. Tkacheva
Russian Federation
candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor, Dean
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest
Alexander M. Lugovskoy
Russian Federation
doctor of geographical Sciences, Professor, Professor
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest
Platon N. Moro
Russian Federation
student of the Faculty of geography and ecology in the field of Ecology and environmental management
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Mazur I.I., Kozlova O.N., Glazachev S.N. Put' k ekologicheskoi kul'ture [The way to ecological culture]. Moscow, Gorizont Publ., 2001. 194 p. (In Russian)
2. Moiseev N.N. Sud'ba tsivilizatsii. Put' Razuma [The fate of civilization. The Way of Reason]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul'tury Publ., 2000. 70 p. (In Russian)
3. UNESCO. First Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. Final Report. Tbilisi. Available at: http://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/EE-Tbilisi_1977.pdf (accessed 18.07.2018).
4. UNESCO. Shaping the Future We Want. UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014); Final Report; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2014. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002303/230302e.pdf (accessed 18.07.2018).
5. Grishaeva Y.M., Tkacheva Z.N., Medvedkov A.A., Volgin A.V., Krylov P.M., Litvinenko V.V. Ecological aspects in the focus of professional education: substantive and methodological discourse. Man in India. 2017, vol. 97, iss. 14, pp. 1-9.
6. Wolff L.-A., Sjöblom P., Hofman-Bergholm M., Palmberg I. High Performance Education Fails in Sustainability? - A Reflection on Finnish Primary Teacher Education. Education sciences, 2017, vol. 7, iss. 1, article number 32. Doi: 10.3390/educsci7010032
7. Speth J.G. The Bridge at the Edge of the World. Capitalism, the Environment, and crossing from Crisis to Sustainability; Yale University Press: London, UK, 2008, 320 p.
8. Sachs J.D. The Age of Sustainable Development; Colombia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015, 544 p.
9. Vare P., Scott W. Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between education and sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 2007, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 191-198. Doi: 10.1177/097340820700100209
10. Nuzir F.A., Dewancker B.J. Understanding the role of education facilities in sustainable urban development: A case study of KSRP, Kitakyushu, Japan. In: 4th International Conference on Sustainable Future for Human Security, SustaiN 2013. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2014, vol. 20, pp. 632-641. Doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.076
11. Krutova L. Modern problems of ecological education and culture in the society development. SHS Web of Conferences, 2016. vol. 29. pp. 2-22. Doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20162902022.
Review
For citations:
Grishaeva Yu.M., Wagner I.V., Tkacheva Z.N., Lugovskoy A.M., Moro P.N. EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TODAY: A PROBLEM AREA FOR OVERCOMING DIFFICULTIES OF PEDAGOGICAL ADAPTATION (ON THE EXAMPLE OF A HIGHER SCHOOL). South of Russia: ecology, development. 2018;13(3):159-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2018-3-159-166